As was petrol/diesel and horses before that.
Horses could become the backstop solution!
Not my preferred mode of transport though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As was petrol/diesel and horses before that.
Home charge points are simply an extra 32A circuit coming from the consumer unit, no separate metering so no way for the utility company to distinguish it from a shower or cooker. And if it turns out to be a problem, you could use a 'Granny Charger' that plugs into any 13A socket, obviously at a lower power of course.
I’m sure they will find a way to distinguish what you are using your leccy for and charge accordingly you won’t get away with it for long.
What is going to be interesting is to see how Diesel, Petrol, Hydrogen and Electric compare
Maybe a 16 year old ev could beat it.What I am convinced about is that our 20+ year-old Honda HR-V, costing 2K six years ago is fine for about-town, and could not at present be beaten for economy by an EV.
yeah , when that changed it was ...WHAT ..where is this and that now a backlash saw them roll an update to the older style screen, but still all screen.Getting rid of the switches and knobs, and putting all the secondary controls on Tesla's big touchscreen is what puts me off most. I see VW have followed suit. Crossed them off my list.
Support the CRK!
(Campaign for Real Knobs, obv.)
and voice is getting better all the timeThat's what Blackberry hoped...
The younger generation are ok with touch screens. I don't see them coming back either in Blackberries or cars.
Each day almost 2 million barrels of oil are unsold thanks to EV transitionand that sjust at todays rates. The UK government will get that part of their loss back in taxation of Evs somehow.
As Gromett and some others have said, charge per milage used is a possiblity, but that will still make the median a potential big loss, not least of all in road tax VED.
As you may now pay full road duty, but you hardly drive your car each day, once pence per mile is (if) introduced, again this will be a huge drop in tax revenue.
Evs will be taxed and the rate depends on the losses during transition, how? dunno, maybe at point of sale, from new, to owner then from owner to owner on a sliding scale, depending on battery size, mileage, retrospectivly charged as they are passed on ? . (pardon the pun).
Id be happy to do pay per mile, or even something along the lines of the previous VED system, but one thing is for sure, the black hole will need filling
I think if all new installations are smart, and all new EVs have bi-directional charging, they won't just be charging (sorry) people to use electricity, they'll be paying them to store it and not use it at peak times. If there's a high enough uptake that will be a huge boost to storage, with no massive infrastructure needed. Each EV stores about 50kWh, so 1000 EVs in a small town can store 50MWh, enough to really help smooth out the peaks.All new installations have to be smart chargers, so presumably they can differentiate between domestic and EV charging? (wouldn't stop you using a 3pin socket....)
That's what Blackberry hoped...
The younger generation are ok with touch screens. I don't see them coming back either in Blackberries or cars.
He didn't save Blackberry. It died not long after that article was written, it was written in 2013.This is John Chen, who saved Blackberry you will see their software is currently in 200 Million vehicles
The use of Phones whilst driving have been banned which a good thing, most drivers can just feel for a button knob or switch which provides tactile feedback.
Given that many drivers just do not concentrate eat or drink whilst driving all of which can get you penalty points and fines what makes a big distracting screen so great? and one that provides no feed back, go over bump whilst aiming for temperature change and your finger bumps in to the increase air flow symbol, been there done that !
Highways England: in-car touchscreens can be unsafe
He didn't save Blackberry. It died not long after that article was written, it was written in 2013.
It was killed by the Microsoft transfer of the Burning Platform memo fame.
Excellent anything that takes the eyes of the road is a distractionI agree to a degree. Moving a lot of a cars functionality to a screen makes sense. BUT, some critical stuff should never be moved.
My apologies. I saw the 2013 at the top and immediately stopped reading. The 2013 at the top was when he started at the company not when the article was written. My mistake.This article is dated:
By Brennan DohertySpecial to the Star
Sat., Feb. 26, 2022 timer8 min. read
even the article says 2022 in the first paragragh
"Eight years after John Chen took over as CEO of BlackBerry, the venerable tech giant from Waterloo is still coming about to a new heading. Caught between its own reinvention as an enterprise software company and the headwinds of a global microchip shortage, BlackBerry has had to make some drastic course corrections well into 2022."
Oh yes he has saved Blackberry, John Chen was brought in as CEO to give Blackberry direction which he has successfully done he is a Top CEO and was the former CEO/President at Sybase
Blackberry as a company exists and is alive and well you will note I did not say they make handsets
About Us
Securing a Connected Future You Can Trust
BlackBerry helps organizations defend against cyber threats. Founded in 1984 as Research In Motion (RIM), BlackBerry is now a leader in cybersecurity—helping businesses, government agencies, and safety-critical institutions of all sizes secure the Internet of Things (IoT).
BlackBerry® products and services include the Cylance® AI-based endpoint security solutions, BlackBerry® UEM unified endpoint management platform, the BlackBerry® AtHoc® critical event management solution, and BlackBerry® QNX®software for secure embedded systems.
I didn't know that. QNX was a fantastic OS at one point. Not heard anything about it for ages though. Perhaps being bought by Blackberry is why.QNX®software
No problem we can all scan read, the blackberry and Nokia story there are many others highlights all technology is intermediate.My apologies. I saw the 2013 at the top and immediately stopped reading. The 2013 at the top was when he started at the company not when the article was written. My mistake.
Blackberry once had almost 50% of the US phone market and 20% of the world market. They blew it by resting on their laurels and not developing fast enough.
It was actually Nokia who was destroyed by the Ex Microsoft Bod and wrote the burning platform memo.
I got them mixed up in my head. In my defence I am working on an application involving the salesforce API and it is the nastiest programming job I have ever had. I hate the SF API. So my brain is not firing on all cylinders.
I was a huge Nokia fan until they went bust. I moved across to Blackberry who then also went pop (at least on phones).
Anyway back to the original point. You said buttons will come back, I suggest you look to blackberry who also thought that. They thought touch screens were a gimmick and didn't develop their own platform until well after Apple and Android had eaten their lunch. Nokia made a similar mistake but it was internal bickering that killed them. Buttons won't make a comeback in cars sadly.
The why, companies normally do this for an obscure tactical reason it either meets a comercial need or takes the competition out of the market.I didn't know that. QNX was a fantastic OS at one point. Not heard anything about it for ages though. Perhaps being bought by Blackberry is why.
Why all that and not just a smart meter in the car that uploads the data automatically?If I were in control I would have a base VED tax that is based on the weight/size of the vehicle to encourage people to go smaller/lighter.
I would then have a mileage tax based based on the point of sale mileage and MOT. I will let authorised garages charge a nominal fee if a user wants to post interim values.
How would this work?
If you buy a car at 10,000 miles. You would state this on the change of ownership papers. Then at the next MOT or voluntary submission you will be give a fee based on that mileage.
If you had it for 3 months and did 3,000 miles. Then over the next 3 months you would be expected to pay the fee either weekly or monthly. If you got an MOT after 9 months had done 10,000 miles then you would pay for 10,000 miles over the next 9 months.
You can voluntarily top up your account ahead of time as you will know the fees. When you sell your car both your and the buye sign the mileage portion of the form.
This will give garages a bit more work, and the MOT system method means no need for extra equipment needs to be added to the car and no scare stories about government tracking.
That is it roughly.
Same here, 2006 Honda Civic Vtec 1.8, not broke down or cost anything in repairs, ultra reliable.I have a Honda Jazz auto, paid £8,000 nearly 9 years ago, and it is as good now as when I bought it. Regularly does 48mpg, and more on a long run. It does everything I need a car to do.
I am not into gadgets, touch screen this, and app that. I don't care that it can't accelerate from 0 to 60 in the blink of an eye, I can only go as fast as the vehicle in front of me anyway. For my driving needs, I plop around £30 of petrol in the tank every couple of weeks or so. So why would I spend tens of thousands of pounds on an EV?
Craig
Previous car was a Honda CRV auto, had it fifteen years, and never had a spanner on it.Same here, 2006 Honda Civic Vtec 1.8, not broke down or cost anything in repairs, ultra reliable.
You are doing the right thing. I spent 42 years working in the front end of the motor trade & when people asked what’s the best thing to do I always said if your current car is running ok then keep it because that will be the most cost effective way of motoring. Thankfully most didn’t listen as I’d have been out of business!I have a Honda Jazz auto, paid £8,000 nearly 9 years ago, and it is as good now as when I bought it. Regularly does 48mpg, and more on a long run. It does everything I need a car to do.
I am not into gadgets, touch screen this, and app that. I don't care that it can't accelerate from 0 to 60 in the blink of an eye, I can only go as fast as the vehicle in front of me anyway. For my driving needs, I plop around £30 of petrol in the tank every couple of weeks or so. So why would I spend tens of thousands of pounds on an EV?
Craig
But not as lucrative as pay per mile, mostly including higher charges for busy routes/peak timesHow easy it would be to put a separate "smart electric meter" in each home fast charger for EVs. Then the company you buy electricity from could send you two bills, domestic and vehicle.
you wouldnt, and no one is saying you have too. You can keeo doing that probably for the rest of your life, there will be plenty decent running ICE motors knocking about way after you are gone.I have a Honda Jazz auto, paid £8,000 nearly 9 years ago, and it is as good now as when I bought it. Regularly does 48mpg, and more on a long run. It does everything I need a car to do.
I am not into gadgets, touch screen this, and app that. I don't care that it can't accelerate from 0 to 60 in the blink of an eye, I can only go as fast as the vehicle in front of me anyway. For my driving needs, I plop around £30 of petrol in the tank every couple of weeks or so. So why would I spend tens of thousands of pounds on an EV?
Craig
Pay per mile wont touch the amount of losses the govt will incur in VED & Fuel duty/ taxes.But not as lucrative as pay per mile, mostly including higher charges for busy routes/peak times
Quite right, here in Morocco where motoring is basic and cheap EV s will have to be cheaper still before they will take them2 points. Toyota recognises that after 2030 there will be a strong demand for ICE vehicles in all the countries where only lip service is being paid to pledges made at COP26 etc. If big names like Toyota, that has a global reputation for making ultra-reliable diesel 4x4s abandon that market, not only are they trashing valuable goodwill but also leaving that ICE market wide open to competitors in India and China.
Toyota also makes a strong environmental scientific case for self-charging hybrids with low CO2 emissions as a practical alternative to 100% EVs.