UK power generation and powering our Motorhomes.

There's no long term planning for power generation because of our political system.
Yup....and these, now frequent, threads end up going round and round in circles..I suspect most of us would agree that the UK needs a broad mix of power generation..but the UK is many, many years behind and when plans are unveiled...they take years to get to and thru planning....madness
 
Nonsense. Have you ever looked at measured heat pump efficiencies?
My reasoning is this. Typical COP (efficiency) is about 3 at reasonable positive outdoor temp and moderate circulation water temp around 50C. However efficiency drops non-linearly at cold temperatures. Although sub zero freezing temperatures aren’t the norm, we do get them and we can get down to -10 where COP could possibly reach ~1.5. But at this efficiency, heating power output from the heat pump drops a long way and a home could struggle for heat. For this reason, heat pump manufacturers (such as Grant Aerona) have a built in heating element which switches on automatically when the air temperature reaches +2.5Celsius and back off again at + 5Celsius. This electric heater must therefore drag down overall system COP efficiency below 1.5 at the lowest UK sub zero temperatures. We could debate whether this is 1.0, 1.2 or 0.9 but the principle is, taking a typical uk home, retrofitting a high temp heat pump and sizing for the coldest days, system efficiency begins to approach parity.

Ground source heat pumps of course don’t suffer in the same way as ground temperatures don’t fall as low as air temperatures.
 
Ah well i guess someone will work it all out.

Meanwhile i have loads of wood and phurnacite for the wood burner. And about 700l of oil still in the tank, so bar lights, i will be ok for a wee while yet.

Certainly a nice feeling of energy security when the oil tanks full..
Great example of energy diversification enark.
 
....... but the principle is, taking a typical uk home, retrofitting a high temp heat pump and sizing for the coldest days, system efficiency begins to approach parity.

Ground source heat pumps of course don’t suffer in the same way as ground temperatures don’t fall as low as air temperatures.
Isn't this the crux of many peoples problems....the system is fine IF it is fitted to a suitable house....modern build, loads of insulation, underfloor heating at lower temps = perfect......100 yr old house with lacklustre insulation, trying to heat larger surface area wall mounted radiators to a higher temperature = poor to terrible.
 
Fr
Nonsense. Have you ever looked at measured heat pump efficiencies?
From -15C down where you going to bring that heat in? I have two air heat pumps, one a little better than the other, but, from -12C the electricity consumption slides towards 1:1.
Don't mention ground source as the towns don't have the space or the flats at first-second floors and above.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Last edited:
There's no long term planning for power generation because of our political system.
I have to agree The Wino. We must get to point where key strategies transcend party policies, mud slinging between parties and avoid the NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome. It is my view and everyone’s view is valid, that in order for a party to come into power, it must agree to deliver the national strategy programmes, agree not to change the deliverables, and agree to update the electorate regularly on progress toward these national strategy objectives.
 
Isn't this the crux of many peoples problems....the system is fine IF it is fitted to a suitable house....modern build, loads of insulation, underfloor heating at lower temps = perfect......100 yr old house with lacklustre insulation, trying to heat larger surface area wall mounted radiators to a higher temperature = poor to terrible.
Certainly that kind of super efficient house you describe will be more temperate at a lower running cost than the latter one you describe.
 
Fr

From -15C down where you going to bring that heat in? I have two air heat pumps, one a little better than the other, but, from -12C the electricity consumption slides towards 1:1.
Don't mention ground source as the towns don't have the space or the flats at second floor and above.
Why are they so popular in Nordic countries then?
 
I have always believed in a dual fuel situation for heating the house.
Without heat it is impossible to live for more than a couple of days in a typical UK house in the middle of winter.
Therefore you have to have a secondary source of heat in order to survive.

Currently my central heating runs on gas.
I have an emergency back up of half a dozen oil filled electric radiators.
(Which get used about every 2-3 years when a boiler fails in a property, either ours or friends)

In the future, the main heating will be electric.
I will replace the gas fire with a log burner as backup.

Personally I think relying on a single source for heat in a house is dangerous.
Although many of us have a winterised motorhome as the emergency place to live.
I’m pleased I installed a multifuel stove in our house. All it needs to work is coal or wood - no electricity required.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Is the best we can hope for, the turning of agriculture acreage into fields of battery and energy conversion plant? It does seem an improvement over the likes of coal power at least. I just wonder about the sustainability of lithium batteries, the supply chain, recycling, and the grip on global battery production that the Chinese state has, and whether we may one day regret funding their war machine.

Through the lense of reduced UK CO2 emissions alone, it is hard to justify against battery storage right now.

One energy storage technology, well proven that in suprised we hear less about, especially given our islands great natural resource, is hydroelectric (and rain😁). Suitable sites must exist, after all we do have mountains and valleys in the UK. And I do like a spot of sailing 😂
Also, as an island, we have 1000's miles of coast and could use tidal power. A power source that is very regular and predictable. If there were no tides to generate power, everything else would be pointless
 
We could debate whether this is 1.0, 1.2 or 0.9 but the principle is, taking a typical uk home, retrofitting a high temp heat pump and sizing for the coldest days, system efficiency begins to approach parity.
It's a bit misleading to say that 'system efficiency begins to approach parity' without mentioning that is only does so on the very coldest days, when the outside temperature is below the 'System Design Temperature'. That's the lowest temperature at which the heating system can maintain a comfortable temperature when working at full capacity. Typically that might be -1 to -5 degrees C. For Manchester it would be -2°C.

At anything above that outside temperature, the COP would increase, and on good days when the heating is hardly necessary the COP can even be 4 or even 5. That's why they usually quote a Season Average Coefficient of Performance (SCOP) averaging the performance over the whole heating season. Usually that is higher than 2, and often higher than 3.
 
Is the best we can hope for, the turning of agriculture acreage into fields of battery and energy conversion plant? It does seem an improvement over the likes of coal power at least. I just wonder about the sustainability of lithium batteries, the supply chain, recycling, and the grip on global battery production that the Chinese state has, and whether we may one day regret funding their war machine.

Through the lense of reduced UK CO2 emissions alone, it is hard to justify against battery storage right now.

One energy storage technology, well proven that in suprised we hear less about, especially given our islands great natural resource, is hydroelectric (and rain😁). Suitable sites must exist, after all we do have mountains and valleys in the UK. And I do like a spot of sailing 😂
I think the sights are currently on vanadium (the production of which is mostly in russian and chinese hands...) rather than lithium if we're talking energy industry scale battery farms. There are several interesting pilot projects using vanadium flow batteries going on around the globe. The flow batteries are interesting because they have high cycle life to begin with and promise near easy near 100% recyclability to boot, are easily scaleable, safe and very efficient. Lithium's main selling point, excellent energy density, is secondary outside of the transportation sector. That's why many companies are looking into refurbishing EV batteries for industrial use - it doesn't really matter if the capacity is reduced because weight and volume are less critical so a cell might have a life in an EV for 15 years and then another 15 years second life in a battery farm.
 
My reasoning is this. Typical COP (efficiency) is about 3 at reasonable positive outdoor temp and moderate circulation water temp around 50C. However efficiency drops non-linearly at cold temperatures. Although sub zero freezing temperatures aren’t the norm, we do get them and we can get down to -10 where COP could possibly reach ~1.5. But at this efficiency, heating power output from the heat pump drops a long way and a home could struggle for heat. For this reason, heat pump manufacturers (such as Grant Aerona) have a built in heating element which switches on automatically when the air temperature reaches +2.5Celsius and back off again at + 5Celsius. This electric heater must therefore drag down overall system COP efficiency below 1.5 at the lowest UK sub zero temperatures. We could debate whether this is 1.0, 1.2 or 0.9 but the principle is, taking a typical uk home, retrofitting a high temp heat pump and sizing for the coldest days, system efficiency begins to approach parity.

Ground source heat pumps of course don’t suffer in the same way as ground temperatures don’t fall as low as air temperatures.
That is not a very good cold climate heat pump you're describing. The Mitsubishi unit I helped my father install to his cabin a while back is good for 110% of the rated 4kW output at -15c and above 85% rated output at -25c. COP is >2 down to -35c or something. Nominal power is 1kW.

Edit: And yep missed you were talking about water heating. So may need to add 10c to the numbers above. Still, latest generation is about rated power at -15c for water-air-pumps too.
 
Last edited:
It's a bit misleading to say that 'system efficiency begins to approach parity' without mentioning that is only does so on the very coldest days, when the outside temperature is below the 'System Design Temperature'. That's the lowest temperature at which the heating system can maintain a comfortable temperature when working at full capacity. Typically that might be -1 to -5 degrees C. For Manchester it would be -2°C.

At anything above that outside temperature, the COP would increase, and on good days when the heating is hardly necessary the COP can even be 4 or even 5. That's why they usually quote a Season Average Coefficient of Performance (SCOP) averaging the performance over the whole heating season. Usually that is higher than 2, and often higher than 3.
When I clarified my reasoning to give a full explanation of the conditions that bring about efficiency that approaches parity, and to this full explanation, you opening response calls it ‘a bit misleading’.

Go figure!🤷🏻‍♂️

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
I think the sights are currently on vanadium (the production of which is mostly in russian and chinese hands...) rather than lithium if we're talking energy industry scale battery farms. There are several interesting pilot projects using vanadium flow batteries going on around the globe. The flow batteries are interesting because they have high cycle life to begin with and promise near easy near 100% recyclability to boot, are easily scaleable, safe and very efficient. Lithium's main selling point, excellent energy density, is secondary outside of the transportation sector. That's why many companies are looking into refurbishing EV batteries for industrial use - it doesn't really matter if the capacity is reduced because weight and volume are less critical so a cell might have a life in an EV for 15 years and then another 15 years second life in a battery farm.
It’s such an interesting and dynamic area, battery technology. Chemistry and architecture. One thing for sure, the motive and static power storage markets are so large that it will drive competition and innovation.
 
When I clarified my reasoning to give a full explanation of the conditions that bring about efficiency that approaches parity, and to this full explanation, you opening response calls it ‘a bit misleading’.
Sorry, that was a poor choice of words. Your explanation is perfectly correct. I was just a bit concerned that someone reading it, not being conversant with heat pumps, would come away with the impression that if a system is designed for very cold weather it would necessarily have a bad COP at normal temperatures. I appreciate that was not what you were implying.
 
I can't say I'm against this Labour government (although I was against the previous Conservative one) but specifically relating to gas/electric imports/exports, both governments have their heads up their arses, everything is short term this & short term that - no one wants to admit that these (and other) problems are because 'they' keep looking for more & more profits instead of trying to look after us 'the common people '.
Gas & electric ARE what keeps us warm & cooks our food - both COULD be made cheaper if they either redused or did away with the outlandish fails standing charges paid by domestic users . . . Octopus energy company (and properly other suppliers) have tariffs for businesses with NO daily standing charge : (admittedly per Kw of gas & electric is slightly more but common sense, a pencil & back of an envelope shows that without these daily S/charges we could afford to heat and eat.
Energy costs are a con just like the removal of winter fuel allowance for the elderly & infirm - and can anyone tell me why we're paying between £7.5 / £8million A DAY to keep illegals in warm accommodation whilst grannies & widows are being aloud to freeze & die off after serving their country whilst those swanning in from across the channel reap the benefits. We're living in a purposely made fuckup of a country
 
I am working on a couple of new build sites where heat pumps are being installed, these properties are very well insulated the radiators used to heat these homes are massive.

I would not be looking at these as a solution to heat older homes, heat pumps are probably a better fit for under floor heating.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Ah well i guess someone will work it all out.

Meanwhile i have loads of wood and phurnacite for the wood burner. And about 700l of oil still in the tank, so bar lights, i will be ok for a wee while yet.

Certainly a nice feeling of energy security when the oil tanks full..
Are you saying that you have oil fired heating that dosen't use electricity?
 
There seems to lots of discussions on the generation of energy, but very little on the infrastructure to support it's use, it's going to take the upgrade of thousands of miles of existing overhead and underground cables, substation etc if people change to heat pumps as the government wants.
 
Last edited:
There seems to lots of discussions on the generation of energy, but very little on the infrastructure to support it's use, it's going to take the upgrade of thousands of miles of existing overhead and underground cables, substation etc if people change to heat pumps as the government wants.

Or... alternatively distributed generation with less infrastructure.

BTW I agree local distribution may need some upgrades though.. it's the LV side that needs upgrade, not the HV.
 
There seems to lots of discussions on the generation of energy, but very little on the infrastructure to support it's use, it's going to take the upgrade of thousands of miles of existing overhead and underground cables, substation etc if people change to heat pumps as the government wants.
....and in the distance a faint anguished cry from tory MPS's of "Not In My Back Yard"
 
There seems to lots of discussions on the generation of energy, but very little on the infrastructure to support it's use, it's going to take the upgrade of thousands of miles of existing overhead and underground cables, substation etc if people change to heat pumps as the government wants.
I think national grid have been working on that for some time certainly they were thinking about future use of electricity to replace gas many years ago I remember a friend who works for them saying so at a time when the rest of us hadn't really thought about it. Whether they carried that through to any action I don't know.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
I can't say I'm against this Labour government (although I was against the previous Conservative one) but specifically relating to gas/electric imports/exports, both governments have their heads up their arses, everything is short term this & short term that - no one wants to admit that these (and other) problems are because 'they' keep looking for more & more profits instead of trying to look after us 'the common people '.
Gas & electric ARE what keeps us warm & cooks our food - both COULD be made cheaper if they either redused or did away with the outlandish fails standing charges paid by domestic users . . . Octopus energy company (and properly other suppliers) have tariffs for businesses with NO daily standing charge : (admittedly per Kw of gas & electric is slightly more but common sense, a pencil & back of an envelope shows that without these daily S/charges we could afford to heat and eat.
Energy costs are a con just like the removal of winter fuel allowance for the elderly & infirm - and can anyone tell me why we're paying between £7.5 / £8million A DAY to keep illegals in warm accommodation whilst grannies & widows are being aloud to freeze & die off after serving their country whilst those swanning in from across the channel reap the benefits. We're living in a purposely made fuckup of a country
As all domestic users pay the standing charge wouldn't it's removal need a corresponding increase in unit costs unless there's some huge profits being made that could be reduced? Where is the magic money tree?
 
As all domestic users pay the standing charge wouldn't it's removal need a corresponding increase in unit costs unless there's some huge profits being made that could be reduced? Where is the magic money tree?
in theory, low usage users would benefit, and high usage users would pay more
 
in theory, low usage users would benefit, and high usage users would pay more
Exactly. The question has to be what is the cost of running the grid irrespective of the amount of energy used pretty clearly if you're going to use any gas at all you need some sort of network. The standing charge should if it's going to be fair reflect that cost for gas and electricity. It would seem fair that those who use more than a certain amount of either have a unit rate that reflects the extra infrastructure.
People like my mother in law who lives in a retirement property would actually probably end up with bigger bills as they have storage heaters!
People do have funny ideas that there's some way of reducing everyone's bills by some sort of penalty free means ( I suppose they believe in water privatisation still!)
 

Join us or log in to post a reply.

To join in you must be a member of MotorhomeFun

Join MotorhomeFun

Join us, it quick and easy!

Log in

Already a member? Log in here.

Latest journal entries

Back
Top