Search For Sites Sold

[nicholsong]

.


I have read comments before that SfS is better for campsites and P4N is better for wildcamping

Also that P4N has more coverage than SfS in Europe.

Would any conributors to this thread like to comment further, please.

 

[bigtwin]

Would any conributors to this thread like to comment further, please.

I think that you have interpreted, and summarised, previous comments correctly.

Ian

 

[125BEER]

The OP is fine but is possibly wishing that they had founded SfS and would now be rubbing their hands with glee.

Ian

Ah.......good point.....

Cheers

 

[Minxy]

The cost p.a. for park4night is £10

It's €9.99 not £10, so about £8.30.

 

[Bill-H]

It's €9.99 not £10, so about £8.30.

I don't have a Euro key on my keyboard

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Jim]

Is it possible to remove all my reviews on S4S? I don’t want HH using my reviews.

You could try, but I imagine you gave SFS the rights to publish your words in perpetuity when you posted the first time. That said, any data that fell under GDPR data could be deleted on request, but I doubt your reviews are classed as private data under the act. Namely:

• Real Name
• Online identifiers, such as IP addresses and cookie identifiers
• Physical characteristics
• Date of birth
• Email address
• Phone number
• Address

ect

 

[Minxy]

I don't have a Euro key on my keyboard

Phone or laptop? On a phone go to the numbers view then press the =\< button and you should see it on the second row first key on the left, on a laptop etc press and hold the CTRL and Alt keys then 4.

 

[Bill-H]

Phone or laptop? On a phone go to the numbers view then press the =\< button and you should see it on the second row first key on the left, on a laptop etc press and hold the CTRL and Alt keys then 4.

€ well I never

 

[Nanniemate]

The subscription went up to £7.49 last year, whether that was after negociations with the new owners had started and to preempt any further raise for a while I know not, but SfS will stand or fall on the willingness of subscribers to keep it up to date. After all, it is only the paid subscribers who add, modify and review the listed sites to keep it current and expanding. Any great hike in fees will make me, for one, question the business model which gets the subscibers to do all the work while paying for the privilege.

Look at the costco model.it charges membership , that where a lot of profits come from

 

[Peregrinator]

Do you use the paid version or the free one?

For two years just used the free one, but cost is so low and worked so well we now use paid version, as I am willing to pay for a app that works.

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[MichaelT]

.


I have read comments before that SfS is better for campsites and P4N is better for wildcamping

Also that P4N has more coverage than SfS in Europe.

Would any conributors to this thread like to comment further, please.

P4n as you say has a lot of car parks, on street parking, industrial estate etc so maybe have more but we use sfs as go to app then p4n and if desperate cc as it has more motorhome stops to use when on holiday, I think p4n is more for van lifers

 

[Lenny HB]

P4n as you say has a lot of car parks, on street parking, industrial estate etc so maybe have more but we use sfs as go to app then p4n and if desperate cc as it has more motorhome stops to use when on holiday, I think p4n is more for van lifers

I agree about P4N, we have been caught out loads of times. S4S is a good app it's just that coverage abroad is patchy, we have been in areas in Germany & Spain where S4S will show two stops but Camper Contact will show 6 to 8 stops. Also the reviews in CC are by people who use Aires whereas in S4S they seem to be by people who expect site facilities on an Aire, probably because most of them are by Brits who normally stay on sites.

 

[MichaelT]

Weve found opposite but they are all there to be used.

I agree about P4N, we have been caught out loads of times. S4S is a good app it's just that coverage abroad is patchy, we have been in areas in Germany & Spain where S4S will show two stops but Camper Contact will show 6 to 8 stops. Also the reviews in CC are by people who use Aires whereas in S4S they seem to be by people who expect site facilities on an Aire, probably because most of them are by Brits who normally stay on sites.

 

[nicholsong]

P4n as you say has a lot of car parks, on street parking, industrial estate etc so maybe have more but we use sfs as go to app then p4n and if desperate cc as it has more motorhome stops to use when on holiday, I think p4n is more for van lifers

I did not say that, but let it pass.

One has to be selective about car parks and street parking, but we have been in some wonderful spots in car parks, e.g on our own under trees next to a stream, or on the top of a hill next to a gliding site with a restaurant next door and a 20km panorama. Some French village CPs are very attractive.

I may trawl through 10 P4N entries to find the best one, but one soon learns to reject some very quickly. If one is lucky No. 1 or 2 is the right one for us.

WE ewcwntly did 3 moths in Slovakia, Austria, Italy and Greece only using P4N does that make us 'van lifers'? Maybe not in a N&B Arto?

 

[Barriesimpson]

It's €9.99 not £10, so about £8.30.

And well worth it in my opinion.

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Wully]

We cant get the app to work just now - been like this for a few days.

 

[Wully]

We cannot get the app to work just now. I updated it from the App Store and now only get a grayed out screen..

Ah…switched my VPN back to the UK from our current location in Portugal and its back working…

 

[Landy Andy]

Mine is working ok.