JockandRita
LIFE MEMBER
- Aug 2, 2007
- 11,995
- 160,717
- Funster No
- 49
- MH
- N+B Flair 8000i
- Exp
- Since May 05 (Ex Tuggers).
You and me both.Indeed a strange one.... and if it is indeed a cross wind/head wind or any other safety gizmo then thank feck I don't have it...
More likely those who didn't view driving with the responsibilities it requires Martin, nor the commitment to the safety of all road users.And some dozed off and ran off the road whilst other nodded off and ran into the back of slower moving traffic
Unfortunately, many see driving purely as a mundane necessity, and nothing more.
A lot of these auto gizmos removes the element of responsibility from the drivers, ie, auto wipers, auto lights, DRLs (with no lights to the rear), etc, etc. It is the driver at the end of the day, who is deemed to be in control of the vehicle, and in the event of an accident, blaming auto gizmos or settings for failure to operate, or alert the driver to potentially dangerous situations, is no defence whatsoever.
As previously stated, how on ever did we manage without all this techy assistance stuff?
BTW, a while ago I drove a 44 Tonne Mercedes Actros with a loaded trailer, fitted with cameras and monitors instead of mirrors, lane assist, and collision prevention control.
I drove for several miles on cruise control without touching the brakes or accelerator, negotiating several roundabouts. The only time I had to intervene, was when I needed to turn left off the carriageway, which obviously the truck's computer system wasn't aware of..........
.......only because I hadn't programmed the inbuilt Sat Nav.
Whilst it was a bit of a learning curve, (and without any input), I was always aware that I'm the responsible element, not the techy assist systems.
Many of the company drivers refused to drive it without any familiarisation input, whereas I saw it as a challenge, which I enjoyed............but it was like taking a calculated risk
Cheers,
Jock.