dodfloss
Free Member
It’s about common sense, I know it goes out of the window sometimesRoad Traffic Act 1988 Section 4
"(3) For the purposes of subsection (2) above, a person shall be deemed not to have been in charge of a [F1mechanically propelled vehicle] if he proves that at the material time the circumstances were such that there was no likelihood of his driving it so long as he remained unfit to drive through drink or drugs."
This provides a statutory defence against "in charge" if you were not intending to drive. However, you have to prove it. They do not need to prove the opposite to "all reasonable doubt" or anything, it is up to you to make the defence stick. There have been lots of suggestions as to how to prove it, such as fitting insulating screens/hiding the keys etc. Any of these is likely to be successful as a defence. Don't just sit in the driver's seat with a four pack with the keys in the ignition and the engine running to keep warm.
The defence covers roads and other public places, such as car parks. For genuinely private places with no public access there is no offence to defend against.
There are similar defences against Section 5 (in charge over the alcohol limit) and 5A (in charge with specified controlled drug over the limit).