Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If everyone goes the same way, it makes it easier for tourists and locals.
I'm all for questioning group logic. But it's not always wrong.
Except you'll be stopping more often due to increased oncoming traffic. You'll probably go slower.Not if there are nose-to-tail 30mph folks taking in the scenery when you want to travel at 60
The adivice is for a clockwise direction rotation for motorhomes,Can I please ask where you heard that????
So you are saying someone who lives on the NC500 and needs to go to the next village to the local CO'OP 5miles away are advised on a 500 miles round trip.???
Think you must have got that from Facetube
Sure there must be some sort of logic there somewhwre but I dont see it..Except you'll be stopping more often due to increased oncoming traffic. You'll probably go slower.
10 people decide to do the loop. 7 go anticlockwise, 3 clockwise. If you go clockwise, you've got to deal with 7 passing events instead of 3.
If all the tourists head the same direction, it'll mean there's less congestion overall.Sure there must be some sort of logic there somewhwre but I dont see it..
NC 500 ain't just for tourists but for locals aswell and they will understandably go which ever direction they need to to get where they want to be..
I believe any "Advisory" direction came about, not to ease congestion but to save they last part of route (West Coast) till last.
Most guides I've seen suggest anti clockwise.The adivice is for a clockwise direction rotation for motorhomes,
well publisised in magazines,not compulsory but advisory,
to make passing oncoming traffic slightly easier
and local van and delivery people get frustrated,
with mororhomers who ignore the advice and travel anti clockwise
In an oncoming sense yes, but not necessarily if you are needing to overtake more slower cars in front of you!If you go clockwise, you've got to deal with 7 passing events instead of 3.
Which magazines? Who reads magazines these days?well publisised in magazines,
I believe any "Advisory" direction came about, not to ease congestion but to save they last part of route (West Coast) till last.
Most guides I've seen suggest anti clockwise.
Also mean all tourists would then possibly be travelling in convoy...... Really Really fround upon and any locals going other way would spend most of the time sitting in passing places letting tourists past...If all the tourists head the same direction, it'll mean there's less congestion overall.
If you have equal number of people going both ways, you'll get more conflicts than if they all go the same way. Every conflict has the chance of becoming a gridlock. They normally occur when you get two convoys meeting each other. In the off season, it doesn't matter because the flows are lower. But in the summer peaks, people have taken hours to do a few miles.Also mean all tourists would then possibly be travelling in convoy...... Really Really fround upon and any locals going other way would spend most of the time sitting in passing places letting tourists past...
That will really pee them off.
Again Guigsy struggling to see your logic?
Much like the ring of Kerry in RoI, the tour coaches go anti clockwise and motorhomers are advised to as wellIf everyone goes the same way, it makes it easier for tourists and locals.
I'm all for questioning group logic. But it's not always wrong.
Rarely have to stop for on-coming on a single-track. Usually both adjust speed to meet at a passing place. I have 17 miles of single-track to get to the local village.Except you'll be stopping more often due to increased oncoming traffic. You'll probably go slower.
10 people decide to do the loop. 7 go anticlockwise, 3 clockwise. If you go clockwise, you've got to deal with 7 passing events instead of 3.
"The Waltz"Rarely have to stop for on-coming on a single-track. Usually both adjust speed to meet at a passing place. I have 17 miles of single-track to get to the local village.
Also, most of the 500 isn't single-track.
You refer to 'the loop' - are you just talking about a specific section of the 'route'? (I put route in inverted commas cos it's simply the coast road.)
We did what is now called the NC500 long before it was so named. It was unspoilt, quiet and beautiful but now it is busy and polluted by so many Motorhomes, spoiling many of the stop off points with some of our friends from the continent parking overnight in inappropriate places, owning the roads and driving as though they’re on autobahns. (They’re not all like that but there are general traits) We still visit Scotland but don’t do the NC500. However, Scotland is a beautiful place best enjoyed out of season, albeit colder.
Scotland is a beautiful place, personally I couldn’t think of anything worse than the NC500, plodding along with the masses.
We went late September a couple of years ago. We'd see the occasional motorhome at the common beauty spots. Most of them we had to ourselves. Only time we saw any traffic was because a far too large motorhome combined with some roadworks caused a tailback on the Lochinvar section. We saw the same group of sports cars (Mercedes GT, McLaren and a couple of Ferraris) a few times over a few days, letting them pass only to see them stop for a smoke at the next village. Repeat. That was the nearest we got to busy.Depends when you go. We went in early May last year and I didn't find it overly busy at all. Yes there were more motorhomes there than other places I've been in the UK but never had a problem finding a park up and quite often we were alone. Traffic on the roads was pleasantly quiet.
This is from the NC500.com website and seems pretty clear that there is no defined route. We are planning to visit at some point (not necessarily sticking to the "route") so got a couple of books, each recommending east to west but only for the thrill of the west coast last, not for the flow of traffic.
View attachment 844431
Just reading that one page of this INDEPENDENT and UNOFFICIAL guidebook tells me that the author has misunderstood the whole concept. Which is a shame as this book is regularly recommended on fb groups so I assume it has a lot of good stuff in it - but presumably also creates/ perpetuates myths such as one-way motorhoming.
So it's not a guide then?Just reading that one page of this INDEPENDENT and UNOFFICIAL guidebook tells me that the author has misunderstood the whole concept. Which is a shame as this book is regularly recommended on fb groups so I assume it has a lot of good stuff in it - but presumably also creates/ perpetuates myths such as one-way motorhoming.
My last sentence was meant to cover thatDepends when you go. We went in early May last year and I didn't find it overly busy at all. Yes there were more motorhomes there than other places I've been in the UK but never had a problem finding a park up and quite often we were alone. Traffic on the roads was pleasantly quiet.
NO the adviced rotation is CLOCKWISE
and travelling anti clockwise infuriates the locals
Eh?? I uses to do the North of Scotland twice a year every year between 1991 and 2016 , long before they dreamt up the nc500 name. I've never in my life encountered or heard of any recomended way round ... motorhomes are not haggis, they don't have 2 wheels smaller than the other they can go both ways round and it makes not a jot of difference which way they go . Scotland isn't a one way system. And the Scottish white van men don't only drive round it in one direction either.probably the "impatient white van man"
was agitated because you were travelling in the opposite direction
to the Clockwise direction recommended for Motorhomes