Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am considering fitting Tessa electric levellers to my Malibu PVC. I have ruled out hydraulic systems as there is simply no space to fit the pump. Has anyone fitted a Tessa system and if so what are the plus/minus opinions please.
Legs are really sturdy, far more so than the hydraulic ones, which I frequently notice are bent.
I suggest when you go past motorhomes with levellers then look carefully. I quite regularly see ones that are at an angle. I presume either the mountings bend, or where the levellers are connected to the mountings.Rubbish, if they were bent, then you would not be able to extend or retract them as they would jam.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Mine came with large pads, I can put underneath, together with a pole to put them in place. In nearly 3 years of regular use I've never needed them so far.The feet on the Tessa electric levellers are very small in area, so you will likely need to put a pad with a larger area under the feet when on grass.
Our E&P levellers feet are 230mm diameter, and sometimes we need pads under our feet to stop us sinking when the ground is soft-ish.
I suggest when you go past motorhomes with levellers then look carefully. I quite regularly see ones that are at an angle. I presume either the mountings bend, or where the levellers are connected to the mountings.
Mine came with large pads, I can put underneath, together with a pole to put them in place. In nearly 3 years of regular use I've never needed them so far.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
You said " Legs are really sturdy, far more so than the hydraulic ones, which I frequently notice are bent.", which is what I commented on and as I said your statement was untrue and complete rubbish, and now you are moving the goalposts.
Got away lucky up to now then.![]()
PVC are generally far lighter than C class. 50kg is neither here or there for me when I have a payload of 700kg.AFAICT hydraulic systems generally are around 50Kg, as is the Tessa system. The ALKO one is comes in at a whisker under 70Kg. That's a big dent in your payload.
Not nice. No need for that.Oh dear. Try looking up a definition of bent. Simply put, bent means not straight.
No not lucky, just careful where I park.
Never found the need to put anyone on ignore on this forum .......... until now.
Think you will find a google search for definition has the below, which is far from not straight.Oh dear. Try looking up a definition of bent. Simply put, bent means not straight.
No not lucky, just careful where I park.
Never found the need to put anyone on ignore on this forum .......... until now.
Not nice. No need for that.
Then perhaps you ought to go back and look at Two on Tour's comment which was not only not nice, but very unpleasant.Not nice. No need for that.
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Sorry. Robust yes, unpleasant no. In my eyes only of course.Then perhaps you ought to go back and look at Two on Tour's comment which was not only not nice, but very unpleasant.
OK, if you also want to be pedantic, my original statement still holds. I wrote "Legs are really sturdy, far more so than the hydraulic ones, which I frequently notice are bent." I could just as easily used the definition above to say "Legs are really sturdy, far more so than the hydraulic ones, which I frequently notice are at an angle."Think you will find a google search for definition has the below, which is far from not straight.
View attachment 933704
we are not being pedantic your original statement does not hold, you stated bent and by definition is not what you obviously meant, if you had said angle you would not be having this conversationOK, if you also want to be pedantic, my original statement still holds. I wrote "Legs are really sturdy, far more so than the hydraulic ones, which I frequently notice are bent." I could just as easily used the definition above to say "Legs are really sturdy, far more so than the hydraulic ones, which I frequently notice are at an angle."
we are not being pedantic your original statement does not hold, you stated bent and by definition is not what you obviously meant, if you had said angle you would not be having this conversation
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
Boutros Boutros-Ghali Is on standby if you need any help .
I don’t imagine I’d lose much sleep over that, life’s a short journey to worry if someone ignores me, oops that’s more like farcebook hahaCareful or you will be on ignore.![]()
![]()
So, getting back on topic…..could anyone give me a cost indication for fitting the Tessa system?
But how much is fitting?£2704.93 plus fitting
![]()
TESA AutoLift 4 Levelling System
<p>The Autolift system is driven by an electronic control unit for self-levelling of your vehicle, the jacks can also be controlled manually and th...www.roadpro.co.uk
Subscribers do not see these advertisements
But how much is fitting?
Is he ? Is that why he’s not answering my calls ?Unfortunately, I fear he is unlikely to be of any help as he has been dead for over 8 years.![]()
![]()
Cannot find anything on google which is odd.So, getting back on topic…..could anyone give me a cost indication for fitting the Tessa system?
Many thanks for the infoI have the Tesa system on my PVC, and very good it is too. I got that system for the same reason, no space to fit the pump, though there are some where the pump goes underneath. However, I'm not sure it was possible to fit the hydraulic ones anyway, as I have water tanks where they normally fit. My rear legs fit behind the rear wheels. Mud flaps keep them clean. Legs are really sturdy, far more so than the hydraulic ones, which I frequently notice are bent. Only two downsides are that the system cannot replace a car jack with a flat tyre as the legs need enough space to fold down, and they do not lift as high as hydraulic ones, though they will lift enough to lift the wheels off the ground.
Another big advantage is the price. They are a significant amount cheaper than hydraulic.