Langtoftlad
LIFE MEMBER
- Apr 12, 2011
- 9,653
- 173,164
- Funster No
- 16,024
- MH
- WildAx Aurora FB [PVC]
- Exp
- Since 2015
Dog meet bone
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because there are so many accidents, injuries and deaths Caused by A Frames.A man on a mission to stop others using what he doesn’t want to use. Thousands use a frames in the US and here with no problem, why meddle.
Well if it doesn’t follow….it may have broken loose due to insufficient or substandard mounting and lack of inspection........one of the others or both may still follow.
AFAIK it could be classed as illegal on two counts,Wonder where that leaves me. I tow my trike with its front wheel in a non swivel bracket on the back of my moho. The back wheels are trailed on the road. The swivel point horizontally is the trike headstock bearing and in the vertical plane is the front wheel axle
You miss the point, it isn‘t the a-frame (usually) that’s the issue, it’s what they fastened to. 1,000’s may use them without issue but, they are not fool-proof!A man on a mission to stop others using what he doesn’t want to use. Thousands use a frames in the US and here with no problem, why meddle.
And the point of your diatribe is?Because there are so many accidents, injuries and deaths Caused by A Frames.
Only last year the OP posted one, the same one, several times when asked for examples, one that had been installed for, from memory ten or more years, one that ‘could’ of hurt someone as it broke away from the towing vehicle.
I have a little 4 X 4 that I bought new to tow occasionally, I chose it as it’s a popular choice in the States, due to its popularity in the States the manufacture has a section about what to do when towing on an A frame in the owners manual.
My insurers are happy it’s towed on an A Frame with no additional premium, so one assumes my insurers see no additional risk.
The Government website, suggests taking it abroad may be an issue, but they simply see it as a trailer to all intents and purposes.
The Police have never shown any interest in its legality, only its ingenuity, and trust me, when you have a blow out in the front wheel of a 10 ton 33’ RV with an A Framed car on the back, on the A303 on a Bank Holiday Friday afternoon ( We made it onto Sally Traffic) you end up with lots of Policemen helping, many of which asking if the could ‘peek inside’ all of whom gratefully took a cup of tea or coffee handed out of the window whilst a commercial tyre company sorted out the problem, and the general consensus about the car was ’great idea
‘
So I’m totally happy about my occasional A Frame use.
I am not a moron (well not always according to my wife) I understand that things need inspection and repair from time to time. All things do, we don’t ban cars just because they need maintenance, inspection and repair, especially as vehicles get older.
Don Quixote used to ride round Spain, and would fight Demons, nasty dangerous Demons, it was his calling, his destiny, only Don Quixote could see the Demons that he fought, so the gentry and peasants alike, sadly used to laugh at him as he was attacking windmills, simple, benign, windmills.
Sancho, his Squire would try to shield his master from the reality of his delusional attacks on Windmills by commenting on the ‘possibility’ that Demons may exist, whilst continually trying to convince the Locals that his Master wasn’t delusional
Some see windmills, some see Demons!
Or they have been lucky,,BUSBY.I do believe in Germany a toad is illegal because it has an engine so can’t be a trailer. In Spain any towed vehicle has to have all four wheels off the road.
Having seen quite a few toads in Spain this past few years it seems that it’s not enforced.
Nothing to do with being on a mission! I’ve quoted an update in legislation, end of!God here we go again, man on a mission part 1001 I name no names.
Can Jim close this before it gets out of hand again like all A frame threads.
Haaaaaaa does my head in.
Enforcement in Spain is definitely sporadic. I guess it depends how sociable el policía is feeling. One thing for sure trying to con him isn’t going to aid anyone’s cause! This amendment to legislation closes that loophole at least.Or they have been lucky,,BUSBY.
The point of my 'diatribe' is saying what the Government, my insurers and the police think about my A framed car, and what the car manufacturers say to do when towing it on an A FrameAnd the point of your diatribe is?
The post I made was about an update in legislation, specifically The Trailer Registration Regulations 2021.
Nothing more! It was for public information.
Yes it’s a forum and yes, everyone is entitled to an opinion, that works both ways! Regarding what car manufacturers say, of 15 I wrote to over a year ago, not one supported towing their cars on an a-frame! If you listened to them, there would be no a-framing in the U.K.The point of my 'diatribe' is saying what the Government, my insurers and the police think about my A framed car, and what the car manufacturers say to do when towing it on an A Frame
It's called a forum, and until Jim says different everyone is entitled to an opinion.
I didn't quote your waffle, but being me, don't care if you don't like my factual post
Have a lovely weekend
I am not surprised at that. I would have guessed that reply was inevitable based on the fact that they would want to avoid any potential liability however tenuous, or the expense of homologation.Regarding what car manufacturers say, of 15 I wrote to over a year ago, not one supported towing their cars on an a-frame! If you listened to them, there would be no a-framing in the U.K.
Your wrongYes it’s a forum and yes, everyone is entitled to an opinion, that works both ways! Regarding what car manufacturers say, of 15 I wrote to over a year ago, not one supported towing their cars on an a-frame! If you listened to them, there would be no a-framing in the U.K.
Homologation really should fall in the lap of the a-frame suppliers. Trailer manufacturers have had to do it since Oct 2012!I am not surprised at that. I would have guessed that reply was inevitable based on the fact that they would want to avoid any potential liability however tenuous, or the expense of homologation.
And the car you tow is?Your wrong
My hand book has a section on "Towing on an A Frame, as I posted earlier which is why I ordered the car, brand new, just to tow occasionally
According to an old post "Daihatsu Terios"And the car you tow is?![]()
Sadly, Daihatsu weren’t on my list!According to an old post "Daihatsu Terios"
There is no dolly the front wheel is rigid to a frame bolted to the tow hitch bracket. It uses the headsock as swivel. So in effect it's an articulated 6 wheel on the road with no brakes on the rear set. It's under 350 kg. Nobody has ever stopped me or questioned it in 10 years of towing.AFAIK it could be classed as illegal on two counts,
1. As brakes are fitted to the rear wheels , these should be operational when the towing vehicle is braking.
2. Any dolly that lifts the front wheel(s) off the road should only be used for recovery purposes and as such restricted to 40mph.
Of course I could be talking total ******s (I'll let you fill in the blanks).![]()
No brakes fitted on the rear? If so, that’s a CatO1 trailer and at 350kg, perfectly legal. If brakes are fitted however, even at that weight, they have to be operational.There is no dolly the front wheel is rigid to a frame bolted to the tow hitch bracket. It uses the headsock as swivel. So in effect it's an articulated 6 wheel on the road with no brakes on the rear set. It's under 350 kg. Nobody has ever stopped me or questioned it in 10 years of towing.
I commend your motives but the evidence of dangerous A frames is not an issue I once again refer you to the house of commons report delivered by the DOT as required by law. That detailed report covering all trailers including caravans with over 200 incidents of varying severity..with AFrames incidents being 0.I’m no expert on the structural integrity of each vehicle that’s likely to be a-framed but it’s clear the original, unmodified crash protection beam isn’t adequate for the stresses & strains imparted by a-framing, on certain vehicles. Only appropriate testing can separate the adequate from the inadequate! One a-frame company I’m aware of do their own in house testing on their reinforced towing eyes so it is possible without resorting to heavy structural fabrications.
if a small country like New Zealand can have approvals and certification through their LVVTA scheme, it begs the question why the U.K. can’t implement something similar.
I read something a while ago about the DfT’s report…. But, the .gov website itself admits that statistics, other than fatalities, are seriously flawed.I commend your motives but the evidence of dangerous A frames is not an issue I once again refer you to the house of commons report delivered by the DOT as required by law. That detailed report covering all trailers including caravans with over 200 incidents of varying severity..with AFrames incidents being 0.
I agree that a safety check is required bi yearly but if A frames had been careering all over British roads they would of been removed years ago ..if you look at American statistics for A frames it's a similar statistic profile to the UK . Don't get me wrong this is all about risk aversion and mitigation and that risk is not prominent enough to legislate, a voluntary system could be introduced where if you don't do it ,risk and consequence falls to the driver attaching it.
Would think Covid has had an influence on enforcement. BUSBY.Enforcement in Spain is definitely sporadic. I guess it depends how sociable el policía is feeling. One thing for sure trying to con him isn’t going to aid anyone’s cause! This amendment to legislation closes that loophole at least.
Yes it’s a forum and yes, everyone is entitled to an opinion, that works both ways! Regarding what car manufacturers say, of 15 I wrote to over a year ago, not one supported towing their cars on an a-frame! If you listened to them, there would be no a-framing in the U.K.
I don’t think you can tell someone else what they should feel strongly about and campaign for. I don’t share TonyEmm ’s views about A frames but I do defend his right to free speech and personal opinions.Why not campaign against something like smart motorways which are really dangerous rather than banging on about A frames which are hardly dangerous in the grand scheme of things....?!