Now we HAVE to downsize...

Did they take the doors apart (no, not blow the doors off!), or fit some sort of thermal curtain?
There already is a sort of thermal curtain when the heating is on. There is a heating vent on the head end of the bed that blows warm air out sideways across the doors.
IMG_0612.webp
 
I had a Concord 890 two single beds over the garage it was a great van but because of eye problems had to down grade bought Hymer 588DL brillant great move same layout as the concord but smaller and able to do all I did in my old van but without my BMW 750 in the garage

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Difficult but not impossible.
View attachment 990769View attachment 990770
Insulation is covered in this video between 2 and 3 minutes in.

I would agree that there is more than many PVC converters put ( or even some coachbuilders), but its just not thick enough to make a significant difference and I couldnt see any going under the floor and whatsmore a lot of scope for cold bridging, its not really Cathargos fault because its very difficult to retrofit to a panel van.
 
I would agree that there is more than many PVC converters put ( or even some coachbuilders), but its just not thick enough to make a significant difference and I couldnt see any going under the floor and whatsmore a lot of scope for cold bridging, its not really Cathargos fault because its very difficult to retrofit to a panel van.
I agree some A Class motorhomes will be better insulated but I think there is enough insulation in the Malibu Van to make a significant difference. The floor panel is a sandwich which includes 20mm of insulation, the type used in refrigerated trucks. I did a fair bit of research about the construction before buying. They claim to have prevented cold bridges and I think this is largely true of the vans now coming out of their new bespoke van plant in Slovenia. I am probably being a bit over defensive about my choice of van but what I am trying to say is that if someone has to downsize there are properly built van conversions out there.
IMG_0649.webp
 
And now for the bizarre bed arrangement in the Malibu. It's halfway between a double bed and two singles. The two "halves" are neither the same length, nor the same width. Further the bedding is arranged in four mattress sections. It's arranged this way to provide easy access to under-bed storage. However it appears to only be easy if each of the four mattress sections have their own fitted sheets and, if required, mattress protectors/toppers.

The expensive, £360, Malibu bedding option seems to have four fitted sheets to match the mattress sections, and some cushions etc. Options seem to be:

  • accept this price per set of sheets
  • find someone to make bespoke bedding (there are internet companies offering to do so)
  • compromise by just using single bedding stuff which won't be tidy nor convenient for accessing under-bed storage
  • use sleeping bags

There's an even more expensive option. For a further £405 you can get an infill cushion (and presumably supporting infrastructure) to make it into a more traditional double bed shape, though two metres wide so standard sheet sizes won't fit will they? And this would make under-bed storage even more inaccessible.

Anyone got any views on all this?

1734722947846.webp


1734722974619.webp
 
And now for the bizarre bed arrangement in the Malibu. It's halfway between a double bed and two singles. The two "halves" are neither the same length, nor the same width. Further the bedding is arranged in four mattress sections. It's arranged this way to provide easy access to under-bed storage. However it appears to only be easy if each of the four mattress sections have their own fitted sheets and, if required, mattress protectors/toppers.

The expensive, £360, Malibu bedding option seems to have four fitted sheets to match the mattress sections, and some cushions etc. Options seem to be:

  • accept this price per set of sheets
  • find someone to make bespoke bedding (there are internet companies offering to do so)
  • compromise by just using single bedding stuff which won't be tidy nor convenient for accessing under-bed storage
  • use sleeping bags

There's an even more expensive option. For a further £405 you can get an infill cushion (and presumably supporting infrastructure) to make it into a more traditional double bed shape, though two metres wide so standard sheet sizes won't fit will they? And this would make under-bed storage even more inaccessible.

Anyone got any views on all this?

View attachment 991022

View attachment 991023
Our single beds did have a separate middle bit. Our underbed had doors on side. Also beds were slightly different lengths but only a few CMS. I bought single jersey sheets which worked okay, and the middle bit I bought a cot Jersey sheet. All from LaRedoute.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Two companies have quoted prices for bespoke stuff to match each of the four mattress sections.

If anyone has, or is considering, a Malibu, I have the details. Basically mattress covers are £100+ depending on quality. Fitted sheets, too, are £100+ depending on quality. Still a lot cheaper than Malibu stuff, unless you particularly want sausage cushions or a blanket/throw with a Carthago logo.
 
And now for the bizarre bed arrangement in the Malibu. It's halfway between a double bed and two singles. The two "halves" are neither the same length, nor the same width. Further the bedding is arranged in four mattress sections. It's arranged this way to provide easy access to under-bed storage. However it appears to only be easy if each of the four mattress sections have their own fitted sheets and, if required, mattress protectors/toppers.

The expensive, £360, Malibu bedding option seems to have four fitted sheets to match the mattress sections, and some cushions etc. Options seem to be:

  • accept this price per set of sheets
  • find someone to make bespoke bedding (there are internet companies offering to do so)
  • compromise by just using single bedding stuff which won't be tidy nor convenient for accessing under-bed storage
  • use sleeping bags

There's an even more expensive option. For a further £405 you can get an infill cushion (and presumably supporting infrastructure) to make it into a more traditional double bed shape, though two metres wide so standard sheet sizes won't fit will they? And this would make under-bed storage even more inaccessible.

Anyone got any views on all this?

View attachment 991022

View attachment 991023
Love the ping-pong bats under the bed. Where is the wif-waf table stored? 🙂
 
9Etype We also have a B588DL, but plated at 3850.
We're happy with the van and would hope to be able to down plate it, should the need arise.
I'd be interested to know whether you've taken yours to the weighbridge.
Ours was recently weighed at 3620kg and I'm just wondering how easy or difficult it would be to get it down to 3500.
 
I've weighed my Hymer multiple times - B698. Not a chance of downsizing it to 3500kg.

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
I've weighed my Hymer multiple times - B698. Not a chance of downsizing it to 3500kg.

Same here, on our 3850kg Arto, partly because we do not use campsites so run with full fuel and water. I cannot imagine trying to shed 350kg, even though Basia keeps suggesting it because she does not want to take her C1 test. My medical is due next year so fingers crossed then I am OK on Polish licence for another 5 years.

When I bought it the N&B plate showed 3500(maybe the dealer ordered it like that) but the V5c read 3850, so I wrote to N&B and they sent me a new plate at 3850 FOC.
 
Empty weight of my B698 was 3317kg. Pilot and navigatrice are 170kg leaving 13kg for everything else with a 3500kg limit. That's 16 litres of diesel. No water, no LPG, no nothing :)

Apologies, Bellabee. Your comment on weights probably does not relate to my Hymer.
 
Last edited:
Back to the Malibu I have seen. I insisted on having the van weighed. I was told the actual weight was 2920kg, leaving 580kg available. That compares with a calculated 2931kg based on the figure on the CoC less the notional weights included to arrive at a mass in running order. Given a +/-20kg leeway on the scales it seems correct. So maybe Malibu weights can be believed after all.
 
Sorry to hear about the loss of your C1.

Just an observation if you are concerned about managing with sufficient weight carrying capacity and staying under 3,500kg.

We had a 6-metre coachbuilt (Chausson Flash S2) and empty it weighed circa 2,750 kg, so about 750 kg capacity.

When we changed to a similar length but much narrower PVC, I was initially surprised it weighed circa 3,100 kg empty.

In other words, although PVCs have lots of benefits, a steel van comes with a weight premium compared with a fibreglass-body coachbuilt of similar size. :unsure:

Subscribers  do not see these advertisements

 
Based on the known weights of stuff I think I will be able to transfer to a Malibu, I reckon it will weight 3500kg loaded for a trip, with full fuel, full gas, and 20kg of water, once it has an awning and solar etc.
 
Back to the Malibu I have seen. I insisted on having the van weighed. I was told the actual weight was 2920kg, leaving 580kg available. That compares with a calculated 2931kg based on the figure on the CoC less the notional weights included to arrive at a mass in running order. Given a +/-20kg leeway on the scales it seems correct. So maybe Malibu weights can be believed after all.
My Malibu Van was pretty much on the advertised and given weights. The new EU minimum payloads rules mean they can’t really play around with the 5% allowance like they used too.
 

Join us or log in to post a reply.

To join in you must be a member of MotorhomeFun

Join MotorhomeFun

Join us, it quick and easy!

Log in

Already a member? Log in here.

Latest journal entries

Back
Top