I believe many migrants opt for the UK because they will be better off here than in Europe, even after entering illegally. Once they enter French coastal water they are escorted to the Royal Nany who brings them over the remaining part of the channel. Its now even safer for them to cross than ever before. Once in the UK its Hotel's, warm dry accommodation with Tv's, internet etc., and free food until their application is processed and if eventually rejected many will simply abscond and disappear into the mix like so many others before them.We used Calais the other week and I only saw a few walking along the autoroute.
However, we no longer use stops or supermarkets near ports as we’ve had bad experiences in the past with loiterers around the van and that includes Caen and Dieppe.
Without getting into the debate of who’s fault or because we voted X, what I want to know is if these people are in fear to escape persecution from their homeland, surely they would apply to settle in the next/nearest safe country rather than trapes across mainland Europe to try enter the UK illegally?
If the government wasn’t prepared to give entry visas to the Afghan interpreters who were valuable assets to the UK armed forces whilst serving over there, why should pity be taken upon those who are illegally trying to get into the UK from the French coast?
Meanwhile the Government will continue to flounder as in reality it has no effective solution to this problem.
At some point in the future it is going to become a national crisis IMO.