Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jim that made me really chuckle, nearly spilt the coffee thank you.Iāve received a series of emails from a furious woman in Surrey. Her complaint? A motorhome is parked near her driveway. Not blocking it exactly, but apparently close enough to make turning right out of her drive, a bit tricky or near impossible. Naturally, sheās furious.
Why is she ranting at me, you ask?
Because the motorhome has a MotorhomeFun sticker on it. Yes, sheās holding me personally accountable for this parking predicament.
Trying to add some levity, I replied, āDoes it also have a National Trust sticker? Have you sent them a strongly worded email too?ā
Clearly, she is too angry for humour.
Now sheās escalated her threats. If the motorhome is still there tomorrow, Iāll be hearing from the police for my āmisogyny and rudenessā and her lawyer for damages. Damages to what, Iām still unsure, her driveway, her turning radius, or her blood pressure maybe?
So hereās a heartfelt appeal:
If this happens to be your motorhome parked near this womanās driveway...
Please donāt move it. At least not for a while; let's give her lawyer some blood pressure, too.
Just spotted that MHF has done some sort of edit on my post. The last two words were not "flip off."Are you referring to the Private Eye case? I'll include it below for anyone who hasn't read it, it's brilliant.
This case is well known among lawyers and journalists, especially the phrase "I refer you to the reply given in Arkell and Pressdram". Basically, it refers to a legal case whereby Mr Arkell was accused by British satirical magazine Private Eye of illicit payments, and they had ample evidence to back this up. After printing the allegations, Private Eye received the following letter:
Solicitors' letter to Private Eye:
We act for Mr Arkell who is Retail Credit Manager of Granada TV Rental Ltd.
His attention has been drawn to an article appearing in the issue of Private Eye dated 9th April 1971 on page 4. The statements made about Mr Arkell are entirely untrue and clearly highly defamatory.
We are therefore instructed to require from you immediately your proposals for dealing with the matter. Mr Arkell's first concern is that there should be a full retraction at the earliest possible date in Private Eye and he will also want his costs paid. His attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of your reply.
The reply that the Eye sent back was:
We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr J. Arkell.
We note that Mr Arkell's attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: flip off.
Already done.Anybody near by to put a for sale sticker in the window, with Jim's Phone number on it?
So do you live on a landfill site? Or if it's already FULL, do they not take your rubbish?Every fortnight they park a bin lorry FULL of rubbish,outside my gate for FIVE whole minutes
Already done.
Also advertising a full service with menu with young attractive blonde to boost visitor levels
If she's used up her five free emails, surely she has to pay the subscription for any more...Iāve received a series of emails from a furious woman in Surrey.
I do love a happy ending to a storyAlready done.
Also advertising a full service with menu with young attractive blonde to boost visitor levels
... "thus demonstrating, m'lud, that I automatically send Motorhome Fun stickers to anyone and I don't have records of who they might be."Itās Christmas time Jim, donāt be cruel, send her a bunch of āMotorhome Fun Stickersā
I know of the Private Eye case but wasnāt particularly referring to that. As a solicitor for over 30 years, I was often amazed at the timidity of some my clients. Theyād come wanting some legal remedy such as an injunction or a court order of some kind, when Iād ask them, āhave you ever just said eff off?ā.Are you referring to the Private Eye case?
Why?On a serious note Jim
You might want to move this thread to an area not open to non paying members.
As we have been told, if someone parks over our dropped curb, we should contact the local council parking enforcement team whom will arrange a visit.
I doubt she has even spoken to a lawyer.In all seriousness, I don't think Jim even has a way to identify the owner from the info he holds. And even if he did, there's probably GDPR implications for using it in that way.
Basically, Jim is neither responsible, nor can he provide details for the person that is. So she can waste her money and will get nowhere.
It is a bit sad that lawyers would prefer to take her money, rather than actually tell her that it's a pointless exercise.
Even better when in a motorhome and you can make up the bed put the kettle on and change into your jammas, son threatened this to a taxi going the wrong way round our street, what he actually said was, do what you like mate, i've finished work and am going to bedIt's Surrey, we breed our own special species of "Karens" down here.
When I driving I had one , "instruct" me the to reverse up out of her way, not withstanding the dozen or so vehicles equally stuck behind me on the narrow country road outside of her driveway she had just exited from. When it was pointed out that her reversing up back into her still close by and empty driveway would be easier and quicker she fired back a haughty " That's why they should bring back hanging, for people like you" Possibly, I might have aggravated the situation slightly by throwing my feet up onto the dashboard and grabbing my paper out and start reading it.
Mike.
Yes,I think I said something along the lines of, " I'm being paid to sit here".Even better when in a motorhome and you can make up the bed put the kettle on and change into your jammas, son threatened this to a taxi going the wrong way round our street, what he actually said was, do what you like mate, i've finished work and am going to bed
With respect you can park in the road across a dropped kerb. You can only be asked to move if you prevent the use of whatever on the driveway being used. We have had this when cars often park across my neighbour driveway.No, it isnāt allowed but are you aware that YOU also cannot park over YOUR dropped kerb?
Ian
With respect you can park in the road across a dropped kerb. You can only be asked to move if you prevent the use of whatever on the driveway being used. We have had this when cars often park across my neighbour driveway.
Sue! Sue at once!Just spotted that MHF has done some sort of edit on my post. The last two words were not "flip off."
That's no way to talk about my Mum!I doubt she has even spoken to a lawyer.
She is just nuts
Ambulance chasing lawyers.Why?