Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hello calling all the solar experts!
We have a Victron 75/15, what is the maximum watt panel we can have?
Debbie
Yes the 75/15 is rated to 220 watts.
Hi Lenny,
I have only ever used my Motorhome in the UK, and more specfically for the great majority in Scotland and North of England. BUT ... I have seen 100% output many times. Limited to in the summertime and the hours around high noon, but it still happens! I wonder if your maximum is a bit limited for the reasons I gave above? a 75/15 charging Lithium to 14.2V will max out at 213W - and will be lower at lower voltages (the limiting power factor is not actually the quoted power rating, it is the max output current - if you have ever seen the output current at 15A, that is the controller maxed out)Yes the 75/15 is rated to 220 watts.
I have a 75/15 running 2 x 115 watt panels so 230 watts.
The most wattage I've ever seen, in the UK, from my 230 watts is 204 watts.
I agree. But if you've spec'd your solar setup so you collect enough to keep you going in the spring and autumn, then chances are that you're going to be collecting way more Ah than you need by the height of summer. If I had to make a choice between a 200w panel with a 100/20 and a 250w panel with a 75/15, I'd take the latter. So I'd argue you've better off over spec'ing the panel than the controller.Hi Lenny,
Bear in mind that that that Max Wattage rating - and all the power ratings on the Victron MPPTs - are based on a charge voltage of 14.7V.
If you have Lithium and likely charging at 14.2V max, you will have a lower maximum power output. Also when you are charging, the voltage will be lower and so the maximum possible power en-route to a charged battery will be lower than the maximum quoted.
I tend to over-spec the controller to give a better headroom. Very true that a panel rarely achieves its full output, but when it can it would be annoying to then have the controller throttling it.
I am installing a 200W Panel in a few weeks time and instead of using a 75/15 MPPT - which would be ok 'offically' - I am fitting a 100/20.
I have only ever used my Motorhome in the UK, and more specfically for the great majority in Scotland and North of England. BUT ... I have seen 100% output many times. Limited to in the summertime and the hours around high noon, but it still happens! I wonder if your maximum is a bit limited for the reasons I gave above? a 75/15 charging Lithium to 14.2V will max out at 213W - and will be lower at lower voltages (the limiting power factor is not actually the quoted power rating, it is the max output current - if you have ever seen the output current at 15A, that is the controller maxed out)
(and FWIW, I have actually seen >100% a few times with the Victron Series 4a Panels I have installed as they can output more than the quoted rating)
Hmm, think Id raid the wifes purse for the £15I agree. But if you've spec'd your solar setup so you collect enough to keep you going in the spring and autumn, then chances are that you're going to be collecting way more Ah than you need by the height of summer. If I had to make a choice between a 200w panel with a 100/20 and a 250w panel with a 75/15, I'd take the latter. So I'd argue you've better off over spec'ing the panel than the controller.
exactly. the price difference between 75/15 and 100/20 is virtually nothing.Hmm, think Id raid the wifes purse for the £15![]()
Also only about £20 difference between a 200w and 250w solar panel. If you have a budget...exactly. the price difference between 75/15 and 100/20 is virtually nothing.
Let it go!Also only about £20 difference between a 200w and 250w solar panel. If you have a budget...
just to answer this point, it would be daft to get a 75/15 controller and then with the £20 you may save, buy a 250W panel instead of a 200W. That is just stupid to be blunt as you are knowingly going to lose out. Getting a 250W Panel AND a 100/20 by spending a tad more is much more sensible if your budget and space allows.Also only about £20 difference between a 200w and 250w solar panel. If you have a budget...
I agree. The limit isn't often budget, it's roof space. I'm just pointing out that over-panelling your controller isn't a bad thing. Sure, you might throw away a few Ah at 11am. But you'd be throwing them away at 12pm anyway because your battery will be charged regardless. Maxing for summer time yield shouldn't be your aim. You want to squeeze as much as you can from cloudy days in the off-season.just to answer this point, it would be daft to get a 75/15 controller and then with the £20 you may save, buy a 250W panel instead of a 200W. That is just stupid to be blunt as you are knowingly going to lose out. Getting a 250W Panel AND a 100/20 by spending a tad more is much more sensible if your budget and space allows.
The reason getting 200W of PV and a 100/20? Read my message above and previously.
I'll take as much solar I can get! After I added more solar to my roof to get 450W, I swapped out my 100/30 for a 100/50.I agree. The limit isn't often budget, it's roof space. I'm just pointing out that over-panelling your controller isn't a bad thing. Sure, you might throw away a few Ah at 11am. But you'd be throwing them away at 12pm anyway because your battery will be charged regardless. Maxing for summer time yield shouldn't be your aim. You want to squeeze as much as you can from cloudy days in the off-season.
If I had a 250w panel with a 75/15 controller, it'd probably be a waste of money to upgrade the controller. Because by the end of the day, my battery would be in the same state.
Just to clarify, in my case the reason for using a 75/15 MPPT with 230 watts of solar is that my set up was originally a single 115 watt panel with the 75/15.just to answer this point, it would be daft to get a 75/15 controller and then with the £20 you may save, buy a 250W panel instead of a 200W. That is just stupid to be blunt as you are knowingly going to lose out. Getting a 250W Panel AND a 100/20 by spending a tad more is much more sensible if your budget and space allows.
The reason getting 200W of PV and a 100/20? Read my message above and previously.
now mentioned space .... I fitted 90W panels on my motorhome. Could have bought bigger ones no problem. So why didn't I? Because they wouldn't fit! 3 of the 90W panels filled in the gap between two skylights and side to side perfectly. No other size panels would have had the same match (you know, sometimes people DO research what they are doing and do what they do for a reason)
And a perfectly valid thing you have done. I would have recommended you do the same.Just to clarify, in my case the reason for using a 75/15 MPPT with 230 watts of solar is that my set up was originally a single 115 watt panel with the 75/15.
I then added a second 115 watt panel, taking my solar up to 230 watts.
After speaking to a very well respected installer it was decided that it wasn't worth replacing my 75/15 with a 100/20.
If I had installed the 2 x 115 watt panels at the same time I would have fitted a 100/20 MPPT.
Personally I selected the smallest controller for my two types of panels that the Victron model said would avoid any clipping at both high and low temps. The panels were what could be fitted in the available space. Hoped to get the max output I could.....I agree. The limit isn't often budget, it's roof space. I'm just pointing out that over-panelling your controller isn't a bad thing. Sure, you might throw away a few Ah at 11am. But you'd be throwing them away at 12pm anyway because your battery will be charged regardless. Maxing for summer time yield shouldn't be your aim. You want to squeeze as much as you can from cloudy days in the off-season.
If I had a 250w panel with a 75/15 controller, it'd probably be a waste of money to upgrade the controller. Because by the end of the day, my battery would be in the same state.
That's incorrect. The controllers do have a maximum current on the panel/input side that should not be exceeded. The output side however will throttle amps down to the maximum output without issue.And a perfectly valid thing you have done. I would have recommended you do the same.
The Victron Controllers have a hard limit on the voltage input of the panels - so you would never want to connect panels in series that would take you above 75V on a 75/15, but they don't care how much current is coming in from the panels - anything that would take the output current of 15A just gets capped. You could connect 1000W of solar to a 75/15 and it would work perfectly and no damage would occur - you just would not get more than 15A out the controller.
(PS. other controllers are not always so forgiving).
I am sure that that is not the case in operation, but fair enough. have to agree to differ.That's incorrect. The controllers do have a maximum current on the panel/input side that should not be exceeded. The output side however will throttle amps down to the maximum output without issue.
So two 200W panels with 20V output voltage and 10A output current would work with the 75/15 in series (40V/10A) and would nicely throttle down to 15A output for a 12V system , but would cause overcurrent shutdowns to avoid damaging the controller when wired in parallel (20V/20A) instead of throttling down since the 75/15 is specced for 15A max PV short circuit current.
I am sure that that is not the case in operation, but fair enough. have to agree to differ.
There are two limits, when determining the maximum array size that can be connected to an MPPT:
- The Maximum PV open circuit voltage (Voc at STC)
- The Maximum PV short circuit current (Isc at STC)
Both values are specified in the datasheets of all our MPPT Solar Charge Controllers. Those two ratings of the PV array must not exceed these MPPT limits.