For f's sake?Probably couldn't translate to English ,what he really wanted to say
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For f's sake?Probably couldn't translate to English ,what he really wanted to say
Mon deu ,or similar.For f's sake?
Why assume that the other person caused the accident?Firstly I'd be claiming off the other persons insurance for causing it & they haven't any opinion they just have to pay for my repairs/injuries. That's why we don't do knock 4 knock.My insurance company would be doing the claiming.
You probably need to contact Motability my father like many people have had vehicles modified so they can drive where they would not be able to with a standard vehicle. If any one has just jumped in my fathers car and tried to drive it would probably have crashed due to the minute steering inputs.We’re looking into a motor home if my health improves but currently I’m unable to sit for longer than 5 minutes. Is there any loophole where you can lie in a bed but belted maybe while the motor home is on the road? We’re in England so mainly Uk rules but if my health allows we would eventually be looking to travel further
Not true.No not legal. You need to be in forward facing seat with seat belts.
............." Avec un cuppa ? "Mon deu ,or similar.
Rear seatbelts only became compulsory in vehicles built from 1989 onwardsThat said, I’ve seen many passengers exit land rovers with side seats, unbelted. Passengers in self builds, old trucks and all sorts of vehicles on ferries docking on the continent.
Hi Brains.They are still in operation (or at least were pre-pandemic)
https://www.across.org.uk/our-jumbulance/
Hi Brains.I've been to Lourdes many times since the mid 1980's,
Because it wouldn't be my fault?Why assume that the other person caused the accident?
Ah. I didn't realise there were two of us perfect drivers on the roadBecause it wouldn't be my fault?
Tea BagHi Brains.
Been twice. Once as we were coming back on bicycles.Down the french coast,over the Pyrenees,cycle along the Spanish side and recrossed back near " Jaca " spain and road some of the " Tour de France " course ( on a Dawes Clansman ) back. Stopping at a Camping site at Argeles Gazost in a tent and calling in from there.
Second time . While down there with a twin axle Gin Palace stopping at " Pyrenees Park Natura " near Lac D'estaing This really is/was a super site if you are a hill walker,just up from the site is the Lac,then there are finger posted walks radiating in all directions from there with Km's and. approx times . Would love to go again to that site,but they say never go back........ We will see,
Tea Bag
PS. Greenwich ? Tunnel Refineries SE 10... loaded Glucose Syrup out of ther a time or two.
I don't fancy the improved chances for cabin crew in a head on impact because they are facing backwardsRear ward facing seat are actually safer (belted passengers) in the event of a vehicular head on impact, which is why the airline cabin crew are seated this way!
As an FYI the only survivor of the Lockerby bombing was a stewardess, however she died before she could be got to hospital. But is does seem that rear facing seats in a plane give you marginally better odds.I don't fancy the improved chances for cabin crew in a head on impact because they are facing backwards
Maybe that's the cunning plan.From what I've seen of caravans turning to matchwood in a crash if she's lying on the bed and you crash I can't see that ending well
Unfortunately Gus, the company your or anyone else's insurance company would be claiming against would have a very good case for rejecting any element of a personal injury claim on the basis of contributory negligence. And by in effect , breaking the law by not being properly seated, if an accident were the fault of her husband she would not be able to sue him for damages on his policy if she had catastrophic injuries which would require expensive or lifelong care. It is a dodgy risk to take , but up to the choice of the individual I suppose.Firstly I'd be claiming off the other persons insurance for causing it & they haven't any opinion they just have to pay for my repairs/injuries. That's why we don't do knock 4 knock.My insurance company would be doing the claiming.
Perhaps I should insure her then?
It wasn't long ago that children under 14 could sit 3 to a double seat when coaches were used for school transport
Yes ,I thought that as my wife used to lie in the road outside the grand kids house in and they would chalk around her.I took the title of this thread literally before reading the OP’s post and others. Funnily yesterday I was lying on the road trying to fix my A Frame tow car. All turned out well, but I still don’t know the UK toad for lying on the road
Not permitted any more.I thought that’s what coach drivers do when double maned?
The danger isn't from a head on impact [an extremely unlikely scenario] but from a 'hard' landing ... ie downwards .I don't fancy the improved chances for cabin crew in a head on impact because they are facing backwards