The Big1 Euromillions Limit Vote

[Wayne_Lisa]

Hi all

I was asked about changing the limit from £3,00 to something higher.

We will put it to the vote just reply YES or NO to this thread , I will leave it open for a week then post result.

 

[Wayne_Lisa]

No

 

[dazandandrea]

Yes

 

[Dandm]

No

 

[Cinderz]

No

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[DavidG58]

No

 

[DavidG58]

EuroMillions prize breakdown | Results | The National Lottery

Check EuroMillions results and prize information on the National Lottery's official website.

www.national-lottery.co.uk

It pretty much covers everything apart from jackpots already , I was surprised at the breakdown of prizes no wonder we rarely get prizes that even pay for the 4 line ticket

 

[Old Rascal]

No

 

[AndyPK]

No

 

[Phill D]

No

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[chesterfield hooligan]

No in memory of TheBig1

 

[mobydick]

No

 

[gus-lopez]

No

 

[gus-lopez]

EuroMillions prize breakdown | Results | The National Lottery

Check EuroMillions results and prize information on the National Lottery's official website.

www.national-lottery.co.uk

It pretty much covers everything apart from jackpots already , I was surprised at the breakdown of prizes no wonder we rarely get prizes that even pay for the 4 line ticket

yes the prize layout could be far better distributed.It is nonsensical

 

[Gerby]

No

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[EuroTrotters]

No, but I think one or two tickets may interest more members?

 

[Jim]

I'm not sure what this vote is for, can someone explain. Thanks

 

[Kannon Fodda]

What £3,00 limit???

Do you mean £3,000 as in the point where prize money would be split amongst all? If so keep as is as that will generally cover the extremely lucky event that a ticket actually matches 5 correct numbers.

 

[Wayne_Lisa]

I'm not sure what this vote is for, can someone explain. Thanks

Hi Jim

A syndicate member wanted to raise the limit of £3,000 which at this point is when winnings are shared equally amongst the syndicate.

So saying if it was raised to £10,000 and someone won £9,999 they would not have to share it out it would be all theirs.

Cheers Wayne

 

[Wayne_Lisa]

What £3,00 limit???

Do you mean £3,000 as in the point where prize money would be split amongst all? If so keep as is as that will generally cover the extremely lucky event that a ticket actually matches 5 correct numbers.

Hi kannon fodda

Yes that is what it means, was enquired about raising it above the £3,000 mark.

Cheers Wayne

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Jim]

I started the syndicate, John kindly ran it for me. Initially, we settled upon the £3k because, divvying money up would be a pain and not worth it unless it was over £50 each. We'd get around 50 to 60 players, so we settled on the £3k limit. We have similar numbers now, and I don't see a reason to change it.

Let's say you've been playing for a number of years and a syndicate member won £9999 and the rules said they could keep it, that, could be almost £200 that each syndicate member is missing out on, that would probably cover all the tickets they had bought.

At £3K it's hardly worth the effort and cost to divvy it up, over that, then members should have a chance to at least get their money back, so while I'm happy that syndicate members vote on the minimum, I'll vote no change as I think It's set about right.

NO.

 

[frwjd]

no

 

[EuroTrotters]

I started the syndicate, John kindly ran it for me. Initially, we settled upon the £3k because, divvying money up would be a pain and not worth it unless it was over £50 each. We'd get around 50 to 60 players, so we settled on the £3k limit. We have similar numbers now, and I don't see a reason to change it.

Let's say you've been playing for a number of years and a syndicate member won £9999 and the rules said they could keep it, that, could be almost £200 that each syndicate member is missing out on, that would probably cover all the tickets they had bought.

At £3K it's hardly worth the effort and cost to divvy it up, over that, then members should have a chance to at least get their money back, so while I'm happy that syndicate members vote on the minimum, I'll vote no change as I think It's set about right.

NO.

thats a no then

 

[Marydoll]

No

 

[SpeedyDux]

Being a contrarian, I say YES!

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}

 

[Badknee]

Yes.

 

[Mr Chrysalis]

No

 

[Just smiffy]

Maybe…

 

[gus-lopez]

Maybe…

you been with Tam too long

 

[MillieMoocher]

No

^{_{Subscribers  do not see these advertisements}}