Pretty big CO2 reduction I'd have thought? I'm assuming that the intention to replace Diesel by 2040 goes ahead & if so that particular fuel is out of the equation. The trolley trucks would require a dedicated lane so catenary safety should be less of an issue and it is managed pretty well by the railways (if it happens it never seems to affect crowded stations). Whatever solution wins it will be all of us that pay for the infrastructure. What solution would you suggest if Diesel is not in the running?It may be energy efficient at the vehicle end but this needs to be balanced against the efficiency of the power generation itself (about 40% for thermal power stations) and normal transmission losses along the distribution system. Overhead catenary systems have failures and inherent risks. Adding a new hazard of live high voltage cables lying across the carriageway is something motorists can do without.
Will the hauliers be obliged to pay the full cost of amortising the big investment in extra infrastructure? Would that make the proposal uneconomic relative to the current cost of diesel trucking? It looks like a very expensive solution to achieve a relatively small CO2 gain.