DBK
LIFE MEMBER
My point was the link to their "leisure" site lists several advantages, such as low profile and reduced weight, which I wouldn't argue with. Then it goes into some distinctly wooly claims about being better at low light levels and at higher temperatures but gives no test results to support these claims.The 25% figure has come from mipv who did the trial.
And I've already provided the link 8 posts back for the parent company specifications downloads
I'm sorry I can't provide any more info on specs than they have - I suggest you either contact them direct to get whatever you need or just go ahead and buy the cheapest Chinese panels you have found
If the performance was that good they should be shouting it from the rooftops. I can't see anything obvious in their downloads page about this.
Last edited: