Jim
Ringleader
perfectly legal here as well Jim....if you dont mind travelling at 40mph on motorways and 20mph on other roads...locomotive restrictions apply. oh:
So if it's legal here, it's legal in Spain then?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
perfectly legal here as well Jim....if you dont mind travelling at 40mph on motorways and 20mph on other roads...locomotive restrictions apply. oh:
france has a similar regulation though
Very interesting.
I have turned the pictures round and created a single Acrobat document with them. It is too big to be accepted by the upload facility, of course (as were each of the original pics). But I have placed it here: Link Removed
No doubt Admin can upload the file to the server.
I am sure that everyone has Acrobat Reader installed!
Sens of freedom is being taken away by faceless bureaucratsTime to give this motorhome lark up soon I think.
Can't tow a car, can't carry a motorbike in the garage.:Angry:
Can't wildcamp, can't go into towns, height barriers, speed and lane restrictions, fuel prices
For me its about traveling and seeing the world and £30k to £50k for a decent m/home buys a lot of traveling. The sense of freedom is rapidly being taken away by the faceless bureaucrats, there are plenty of other ways to travel. :Angry:
carrying a bike in the back of what is a sandwich board constructed vehicle could lead to disaster for other road users and the occupants of the vehicle
I cant think of a single logical answer to that Jim but someone has obviously carried out a lot of research before banning it....surely.Buttons, carrying a lashed down motorcycle in a motorhome garage is not as dangerous as you imply. What about the 40 tons on most lorries, the walls are nylon and canvas. In a crash what makes a lashed down motorbike in a garage any more dangerous that your lashed down water heater, petrol tank, refrigerator, solar panel, gas bottle etc, anyway, we can see how you carry your motorbike, now that is dangerous
Link Removed
I cant think of a single logical answer to that Jim but someone has obviously carried out a lot of research before banning it....surely.:thumb:
Originally Posted by Forestboy Link RemovedHas it been banned? I thought having a bike in the back might make it a "Living Van" which has MOT and Insurance implications, if its banned its a new one on me.
Originally Posted by Forestboy Link Removed
Time to give this motorhome lark up soon I think.
Can't tow a car, can't carry a motorbike in the garage.:Angry:
Can't wildcamp, can't go into towns, height barriers, speed and lane restrictions, fuel prices
Have no idea either Jim, I was making reference to Forestboys quote not making a factual statement. Just shows you can’t believe everything that you read on a forum.:Blush:
The difference between a motor-home and a living-home (living van) is almost impossible to divine - but in essence a vehicle is considered to be a motorhome ONLY when it contains those items deemed necessary to operate the vehicle as a motorhome - bed, cooker, fridge, TV etc., etc., etc.
If you add any items deemed un-necessary such as a bicycle, surf board or whatever (you do not need to carry a surf board in order to operate the motor-home) then you become a 'Goods-Carrying' vehicle and (subject to your MAM) you become a 'Living Van' and subject to HGV Regulations.
The official reply from DVLA is thus:
To clarify further, I can confirm that all living vans are regarded as goods vehicles. This is because such vehicles are used primarily for living accommodation but are also able to carry goods which are not needed for the purpose of residence in the vehicle. Section 192 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 defines ‘goods’ as ‘goods or burden of any description’.
As such, ‘goods’ is not a term restricted solely to items carried for gain or reward.
It is our view, therefore, that bikes or cars carried in a designated area on a vehicle should be regarded as goods and that vehicles which have the capacity to carry such items within them have to be regarded as living vans and not motor caravans.
Smaller living vans (under 3,500kgs) can be MOT tested as Class IV or Class VII vehicles depending on their weight. The first MOT test would be required from the third year following registration and then every year thereafter. However, many living vans are outside the scope of MOT testing as they exceed 3,500kgs in weight. These heavier living vans should be tested at a VOSA goods vehicle testing station under the Goods Vehicles (Plating and Testing) Regulations 1988. Such vehicles must be tested annually from the first year following registration.
I hope this clarifies the position. "
Now comes the can of worms (from them to UKMotorhomes.net) ......
You did mention in one of your earlier e mail messages that some people would be carrying a small car from their large motorhomes.
It really is quite difficult for us to see how the definition of items "needed for the purpose of their residence in the vehicle" could be stretched to include small cars.
Nevertheless interpretation by the enforcement authorities is a matter of both fact and degree and we can offer no further advice on the specific point of what would or would not be treated as "goods".
To amend the definitions in legislation, as you have suggested, may seem straightforward to you but would in fact require changes to primary legislation and there are no plans to do this. Partly this is due to the other priorities that exist with a busy Parliamentary schedule, but in any case there appears at this stage to be no evidence that the Police have found a problem with people having vehicles tested as motorhomes which are really being used to carry goods. It would therefore be difficult to justify the need for these changes which would inevitably be time consuming and costly.
To conclude we would suggest that the best advice to give your members is that if they are carrying goods on a vehicle that is over 3.5 tonnes it is very likely to need a goods vehicle test carried out annually at a VOSA test station once the vehicle is over 3 years old. Beyond that if you need advice on the effect of carrying a small car or any other specific items we suggest that you seek independent legal advice.
Well, in our view the statements contained in that letter indicate a shift in the aplication of the term 'Living Van' to motorhomes.
It now seems that it is up to the motorhome owner to declare to the Testing Station whether their vehicle is used to carry goods. If a declaration is made that goods are not carried, then the vehicle will be accepted as a motorhome and be subject to a Class IV test every year from 3 years old.
To take this to it's absolute point of ridicule - if you have a bog-standard 36ft RV weighing about 9 tonnes - you drive it on a C licence and you MoT it to Class 4 standard - No problems.
The minute you put a pair of skis onto the roof of that self-same RV - or you hang a bicycle on the rack at the back - you become a 'goods-carrying' vehicle - and as such you are subject to HGV regulations.
However - it is totally down to your own personal honesty in telling the MoT station that you are likely to put a pair of skis on the roof - or to hang a bike on the back - and for them to decide whether you should then be tested as class 4 or class 7.
This situation, of course, really only seriously affects the 'toy-hauler' category of motorhomes - because most of us would take the bike off the back before we went for MoT!.
However - one point to seriously note from this argument is the term "GOODS" - read between the lines to see what the DVLA people are really saying - and you can begin to appreciate why an RV is considered to be a "Private GOODS vehicle" rather than a car - and why they will always consider that an RV over 7½ tonnes requires a C class licence rather than a B (car) licence.
Dick
Thanks Jim and Jim, this is my first insight to Living Van but it looks very interesting but will require some more research on my part.:thumb:.. this post from Dick on RVOC explains in some detail about a 'living van"
we can see how you carry your motorbike, now that is dangerous
Link Removed
If some Bull bars are barred I'm sure protruding handlebars and a fuel tank have got to be a bit suspect. Have you thought of trading the wife in for a larger model, that would help keep the front down.It's something that is a_good_idea on Ducatos. The front overhang is less than read overhang, the front it too light. I'm not sure how the numbers work out, whether there are fixing points and it looks terrible, but there is merit in it.
If some Bull bars are barred I'm sure protruding handlebars and a fuel tank have got to be a bit suspect.
Just shows you can’t believe everything that you read on a forum.:Blush:
It's something that is a_good_idea on Ducatos. The front overhang is less than read overhang, the front it too light. I'm not sure how the numbers work out, whether there are fixing points and it looks terrible, but there is merit in it.