PP Bear
LIFE MEMBER
At least Dick Turpin wore a mask!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That happened to me took ages and lierally hours on the phone to get the whole thing sorted! In my experince Insurance company customer service is pretty good when buying but if you have a problem they seem to drag their feet!I know someone who endured premium loading just for mentioning a small bump. It was nothing really and they wanted to know whether to claim or pay it themselves. Even though they did not put it through their insurers; the "Accident" was placed on some database that all insurers have access to.
Blimey. £1800 to fix a bumper. I'd be more upset about that than increased premiums.Stealaway
Late last year whilst driving onto levelling ramps, both ramps on the same side, front and rear, the front driving wheel skidded on wet grass and the van slid sideways and off the ramp. Damaged front bumper and quote to fix was / and is £1800. I claimed on the insurance.
So this turns out to be a fault claim. Come to renew my car insurance, despite more than 40years without a claim / accident, the van claim affects my car policy and its loaded as I made a fault claim. Renew my Mrs insurance, that too is loaded because I made a claim. My daughters car, as a named driver, that was also loaded.
I now wish I paid for the insurance claim! This carries on for the next 5 years.
Superb post, most knowledgeable.Change insurers - I run my own broking business and what you have been told is wrong......simply wrong. There will be a supplementary question as to whether a claim was on the policy/vehicle that you are now quoting for. If it's not, it should not affect the premium. if you have already renewed, ask the insurers (other than the MH one) for a review. Tell them they are not treating the customer (you) fairly and you plan to go to the ombudsman
ROFLMAO said the retired person employed for over 40 years in the insurance industry - whose first husband repaired cars scraping for a living - yet folk still wonder why insurance premiums are so high !Blimey. £1800 to fix a bumper. I'd be more upset about that than increased premiums.
I'm not sure if you're agreeing with me or not ???ROFLMAO said the retired person employed for over 40 years in the insurance industry - whose first husband repaired cars scraping for a living - yet folk still wonder why insurance premiums are so high !
But most make no attempt & take the easy "knock for knock" route so blaming both parties .As retired "broker" I can sympathise with the comments but the insurance companies definition of a "fault" claim Is any claim where full costs can't be recovered from a third party,
I found them to be pretty fair, tooI haven't noticed any hit to our premiums, so a vote for AIB (who offer a discount to funsters)
If your going to have a claim make sure it’s a BIG one
I think the same penalty applies if your vehicle is parked when damaged by another.
A pal's car whilst parked briefly in the road one evening and was hit (written off in fact) by a tipsy neighbour's car whilst he had nipped back indoors having forgotten his debit card.
Initially his ins co argued that it should have been parked off the road at night and he had to pursue the fact that it was before the 10pm requirement and he had just got it out of his drive to go back indoors for his debit card before collecting a takeaway. They eventually accepted that but he still lost his NCB and his renewal premium was increased.
He would only have lost his no claims bonus if he had not paid to protect it. or if he had already claimed and put this claim above the limit of his no claims rules. His claim should not have counted as a fault claim anyway, as there was a guilty part to claim against and the claim would therefore not count against his protected no claims bonus. Speaking as an ex head of customer service for a large insurance company, this does not really make sense....I think the same penalty applies if your vehicle is parked when damaged by another.
A pal's car whilst parked briefly in the road one evening and was hit (written off in fact) by a tipsy neighbour's car whilst he had nipped back indoors having forgotten his debit card.
Initially his ins co argued that it should have been parked off the road at night and he had to pursue the fact that it was before the 10pm requirement and he had just got it out of his drive to go back indoors for his debit card before collecting a takeaway. They eventually accepted that but he still lost his NCB and his renewal premium was increased.
As both my wife and I found If the insurance company cannot reclaim all their costs it is logged as a fault claim whether you are an innocent party or not that’s how it is.He would only have lost his no claims bonus if he had not paid to protect it. or if he had already claimed and put this claim above the limit of his no claims rules. His claim should not have counted as a fault claim anyway, as there was a guilty part to claim against and the claim would therefore not count against his protected no claims bonus. Speaking as an ex head of customer service for a large insurance company, this does not really make sense....
Appears to be hit & miss I still have to declare the claim as it was less than 5 years ago. My renewal on the car came through it was £257 up from £197 it was with the Co-op & they said they were changing insurers to Zenith.I shop around every year for car and van insurance. Strangely, I got a cheaper van insurance than I paid last year. However, I could not find a better deal on my car insurance due to the claim. On comparison sites, I put in no claim, then admitted to claim and found generally the fault claim added
£60.
Which was the point I made in relation to the post to which I responded. Always one of the toughest things to explain to someone who has been hit in a car park and the miscreant has driven off( which happened to me last month). If as the OP stated, it was a tipsy neighbour, there would have been someone to claim against.As both my wife and I found If the insurance company cannot reclaim all their costs it is logged as a fault claim whether you are an innocent party or not that’s how it is.
In addition if that claim is on your partners insurance and you are a names driver it will still go against your record…..
Always shop around, is the lesson! Claims are normally declared for 5 years, which is a pain. When I was first in the business it was for 3 years, but that crept up over time.Appears to be hit & miss I still have to declare the claim as it was less than 5 years ago. My renewal on the car came through it was £257 up from £197 it was with the Co-op & they said they were changing insurers to Zenith.
Went on a comparison side and got insurance for £106 with - Zenith.
Indeed, if you feel that you have not been fairly dealt with, and you have exhausted the complaints process with your insurer then threaten them with the ombudsman. It costs an insurance company over £500 if they have to respond to a complaint raised through the Ombudsman, so if the claim is not substantial they will often settle.Superb post, most knowledgeable.
I have taken on quite a few insurers professionally in the past, and whilst I have been selective in only taking on those issues with reasonable prospects, I have nearly always been successful. Certain insurance companies invest a great deal in training their staff in claim avoidance and loss recovery, although others are increasingly concerned with customer retention they complain about the premiums for renewal.
The posts here are indicative of the gross dissatisfaction that the majority feel over insurers, and reinforce the importance of having a good broker to safeguard your best interests at the outset, a qualified independent loss adjustor (not an unqualified "claims adjustor" employed by the insurers) to handle any significant claims which may arise and a legal professional to pursue an outcome on standby.
.
And if all else fails, the Ombudsman offers a fair service, including case studies.
It’s this type of sharp practice that needs reviewing we all need insurance but increases should be reasonable and not punitiveYep had this when my wife hit a deer in her 4 mth old car... she claimed obviously and it affected my van insurance upon renewal as she was a named driver.... it was as you say a fault claim by her... the insurance broker even admitted she would have been better off hitting another car instead of the deer as they could make a claim against the car but they cannot against the deer.... hence why it becomes a fault claim..... my van insurance went up so much i had to remove her from the policy for a number of years...
The NFU, a dear insurance company anyway, loaded me another £100+ after I removed my wife after her 70th birthday from my insurance. They said it made me a worse risk as I have to drive for more time now. She had NEVER actually driven it at all ever. I moved from them to Comfort.Stealaway
Late last year whilst driving onto levelling ramps, both ramps on the same side, front and rear, the front driving wheel skidded on wet grass and the van slid sideways and off the ramp. Damaged front bumper and quote to fix was / and is £1800. I claimed on the insurance.
So this turns out to be a fault claim. Come to renew my car insurance, despite more than 40years without a claim / accident, the van claim affects my car policy and its loaded as I made a fault claim. Renew my Mrs insurance, that too is loaded because I made a claim. My daughters car, as a named driver, that was also loaded.
I now wish I paid for the insurance claim! This carries on for the next 5 years.
It was the neighbour's tipsy 19yr old daughter who took his car without his permission (she didn't even have a driving licence) and also seriously damaged two adjacent cars in the narrow road. My pal did say that the father had trouble with his insurer for leaving the keys 'unsecure' on top of a fridge. It's a complex situation and I don't have every detail but the police did prosecute the daughter.Which was the point I made in relation to the post to which I responded. Always one of the toughest things to explain to someone who has been hit in a car park and the miscreant has driven off( which happened to me last month). If as the OP stated, it was a tipsy neighbour, there would have been someone to claim against.