Stealaway
Free Member
- Jan 8, 2013
- 8,496
- 11,548
- Funster No
- 24,202
- MH
- Burstner Lyseo 690G
- Exp
- Happy FLT since 2011
Maximum torque and maximum MPG on my 2.3 Euro 6 130hp is 1900-2000 rpm and 50 to 55 mph. Around 30mpg on a newish engine, on motorways
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haven't looked at that side of things but are you saying rfl is lower with a heavier vehicle?So that explains your road fund licence then
Hope there's not an engine issue with only 9k on clock. On holiday now and first real run so apologies for my vagueness. Will do proper checks as time allows. I'm not sure price is an indicator of fuel quality otherwise I'd buy all mine at the motkrhome services.No problems staying in 6th uphill at GPS true 65mph when fully loaded. Just about 2300 rpm. 2017 Fiat 2.3 150 with Comfortmatic.
Thinking the OP's engine is lacking a bit of torque and may have some issues that need looking into. Or how about cheapo diesel.
I only buy the premium stuff even though it's now £1.50 a litre.
Yup, cheaper tax on vehicle's between 3500kg - 7500kg.Haven't looked at that side of things but are you saying rfl is lower with a heavier vehicle?
I was checking on line and euro 6 was from Sept. 2017. But doesn't that use addblue? We have manual with 16" tyres. Previous van ran about the same weight, not sure on tyre size, and very little need to change down once going. Have to do some proper checks but you know when something is quite a lot different.2017 should be Euro 6.
We had a 2014, 150hp, 3850kg, on 15“ wheels. Current van is 2017, 150hp, 4500kg, 16" wheels.
Both Comfortmatics only difference we really notice is the newer van is slightly more sluggish due to the weight. Changes up to 6th at 47/48 mph (true speed not Fiat speed) and back down to 5th at 42mph.
Yippee!Yup, cheaper tax on vehicle's between 3500kg - 7500kg.
Nothing to do with age, or emissions, it's the weight class.
The reduction was done year's ago to "help small haulage businesses"
My van was built in Feb 2017 the Fiat part end of November 2016 and its Euro 6.I was checking on line and euro 6 was from Sept. 2017. But doesn't that use addblue? We have manual with 16" tyres. Previous van ran about the same weight, not sure on tyre size, and very little need to change down once going. Have to do some proper checks but you know when something is quite a lot different.
I went from 215x15 to 225x15, same profile. Very surprised how noticeable it is.What size did you go from to???
I'm thinking of going from 235 65 16 up to 225 75 16 as I find the 65 quite crashy. (conti vancos)
Will bring the Speedo up to accurate according the GPS / flashing speed signs.
Cheers James
Cheers James
Yes, that's correct.Haven't looked at that side of things but are you saying rfl is lower with a heavier vehicle?
Transit 2.0L 130ps Ecoblue is 2100rpm at 70mph. That's with the 6 speed auto, 385Nm and only drops down to 5th using cruise control when there are crawler lanes on motorways.Maximum torque and maximum MPG on my 2.3 Euro 6 130hp is 1900-2000 rpm and 50 to 55 mph. Around 30mpg on a newish engine, on motorways
That's the width or the tyre & will not make a difference it is the diameter 16",15", 17" ,18" etc that makes a difference.Jamesh said:
I'm thinking of going from 235 65 16 up to 225 75 16 as I find the 65 quite crashy. (conti vancos)
We've standard fit 235/65/16 Michy Aglise non camping tyres which perform well. The only motorhome we had camping tyres on was the Tracker and they were noticeably poorer on tarmac and louder.What size did you go from to???
I'm thinking of going from 235 65 16 up to 225 75 16 as I find the 65 quite crashy. (conti vancos)
Will bring the Speedo up to accurate according the GPS / flashing speed signs.
Cheers James
Cheers James
Yes, you are correctgus-lopez
Re your comment following on from a comment made by Jamesh
That's the width or the tyre & will not make a difference it is the diameter 16",15", 17" ,18" etc that makes a difference.
=================
I respectably disagree
The profile of the tyre in relation to percentage of width Will make a difference to the gearing.
When I changed from, (memory???) 215 x 75 x 15 to 225 x 75 x 15 the circumference of the tyre increased by about 3cms.
with a resultant loss of climbing ability. I'm not talking much but on certain, well known inclines, the van wasn't as good.
That was down to the difference in gearing.
Yes, but it is surprisingly small & I wouldn't have even thought it noticed? Whereas an increase from 15" wheels to 16" wheels without reduce the tyres profile to compensate is far greater.gus-lopez
Re your comment following on from a comment made by Jamesh
That's the width or the tyre & will not make a difference it is the diameter 16",15", 17" ,18" etc that makes a difference.
=================
I respectably disagree
The profile of the tyre in relation to percentage of width Will make a difference to the gearing.
When I changed from, (memory???) 215 x 75 x 15 to 225 x 75 x 15 the circumference of the tyre increased by about 3cms.
with a resultant loss of climbing ability. I'm not talking much but on certain, well known inclines, the van wasn't as good.
That was down to the difference in gearing.
New tyres, more tread.gus-lopez
Re your comment following on from a comment made by Jamesh
That's the width or the tyre & will not make a difference it is the diameter 16",15", 17" ,18" etc that makes a difference.
=================
I respectably disagree
The profile of the tyre in relation to percentage of width Will make a difference to the gearing.
When I changed from, (memory???) 215 x 75 x 15 to 225 x 75 x 15 the circumference of the tyre increased by about 3cms.
with a resultant loss of climbing ability. I'm not talking much but on certain, well known inclines, the van wasn't as good.
That was down to the difference in gearing.
2300 rpm? That's a GPS 76mph, 79 on the clock, in 6th for us. Telegraph Hill in Devon is a notoriously steep winding hill, HGV's crawl up at around 25mph. We can maintain 65mph for the full length in 4th gear 3000rpm. Need to back right off at the top or the Tranny will be doing over 80mph in no time... and that's before settling down into 6th. Van's only a 130 2.0L.No problems staying in 6th uphill at GPS true 65mph when fully loaded. Just about 2300 rpm. 2017 Fiat 2.3 150 with Comfortmatic.
Thinking the OP's engine is lacking a bit of torque and may have some issues that need looking into. Or how about cheapo diesel.
I only buy the premium stuff even though it's now £1.50 a litre.
Yes but what if you put a motorhome on the back of your tranny.2300 rpm? That's a GPS 76mph, 79 on the clock, in 6th for us. Telegraph Hill in Devon is a notoriously steep winding hill, HGV's crawl up at around 25mph. We can maintain 65mph for the full length in 4th gear 3000rpm. Need to back right off at the top or the Tranny will be doing over 80mph in no time... and that's before settling down into 6th. Van's only a 130 2.0L.
Agreed going from 15" to 16" would make a simalar difference. About an inch.....Yes, but it is surprisingly small & I wouldn't have even thought it noticed? Whereas an increase from 15" wheels to 16" wheels without reduce the tyres profile to compensate is far greater.
The Ford engines are beasts of burden which just keep pulling.Yes but what if you put a motorhome on the back of your tranny.
Was on a tranny. Lovely cab, lovely to drive just like a car. Too narrow for the hab though and was all over the place on motorways. Had to get air ride to calm it down.The Ford engines are beasts of burden which just keep pulling.
When buying a motorhome hardly anyone takes the base vehicle into consideration, heads are turned by the habitation.
The new Fiat engines aren't the best performers and you need to pay a lot of money to upgrade in order to get decent performance. Motorhomes need torque. The new Ducato for 2022 is essentially a facelift, the only real difference is the Techno cab so there's no further grunt to look forward to.
The 140ps gives around 350Nm on an MT but nearly 380Nm with the 9 speed AT. The latter will cost a further £3300 approx plus many builders only offer the 120ps as standard, dealers spec the 140 as a standard which many buyers are unaware of.
The 160ps, a further cost option will give you 380ps on the MT & 400Nm on the 9 speed AT.
For latter kind of performance your emptying your pockets to the tune of a near extra £5000.
The new kid on the block, the Ford, will give you a standard 130ps 370Nm on the MT & 385Nm on the 6 speed AT. The auto transmission is £1700.
The 170ps will give you upto 405Nm. cost for that upgrade and the 6 speed AT is £2900.
The new Pug Blue HDi boils engines, the Renault Master's 150ps DCi offers better performance that Fiat's 160 and the Merc' FWD is basically the same Renault underneath.
Would be cheaper just to get it tuned...?The Ford engines are beasts of burden which just keep pulling.
When buying a motorhome hardly anyone takes the base vehicle into consideration, heads are turned by the habitation.
The new Fiat engines aren't the best performers and you need to pay a lot of money to upgrade in order to get decent performance. Motorhomes need torque. The new Ducato for 2022 is essentially a facelift, the only real difference is the Techno cab so there's no further grunt to look forward to.
The 140ps gives around 350Nm on an MT but nearly 380Nm with the 9 speed AT. The latter will cost a further £3300 approx plus many builders only offer the 120ps as standard, dealers spec the 140 as a standard which many buyers are unaware of.
The 160ps, a further cost option will give you 380ps on the MT & 400Nm on the 9 speed AT.
For latter kind of performance your emptying your pockets to the tune of a near extra £5000.
The new kid on the block, the Ford, will give you a standard 130ps 370Nm on the MT & 385Nm on the 6 speed AT. The auto transmission is £1700.
The 170ps will give you upto 405Nm. cost for that upgrade and the 6 speed AT is £2900.
The new Pug Blue HDi boils engines, the Renault Master's 150ps DCi offers better performance that Fiat's 160 and the Merc' FWD is basically the same Renault underneath.
The Ford bases now have a new lower wide track skeletal motorhome ladder chassis launched in 2018 which is 200kg lighter & 100mm lower. Unlike the previous incarnation this one was designed in Europe.2011 Hobby
Was on a tranny. Lovely cab, lovely to drive just like a car. Too narrow for the hab though and was all over the place on motorways. Had to get air ride to calm it down.
Yeap stuff the English!The Ford bases now have a new lower wide track skeletal motorhome ladder chassis launched in 2018 which is 200kg lighter & 100mm lower. Unlike the previous incarnation this one was designed in Europe.
Last moho chassis was designed in the States which they refer to as having a death wobble!Yeap stuff the English!
We're taking the transit to Turkey!
Cheers James
But does the euro 6 fiat not require ad blue?My van was built in Feb 2017 the Fiat part end of November 2016 and its Euro 6.
Motorhomes started to be built on Euro 6 chassis around September 2016, panel vans it was about 6 - 9 months eairler.
I think it should show it on your Certificate of Conformity
Only the latest Euro 6D ones, from September 2019.Bi
But does the euro 6 fiat not require ad blue?