I no opinions vary !
What's the best mh engine or the most bomb proof ?
3-0 litre ?
2-8 litre
2-3 litre
Etc ?
What's the best mh engine or the most bomb proof ?
3-0 litre ?
2-8 litre
2-3 litre
Etc ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So have timing chains , cambelts .it's also recommended if you stopping using a vehicle regularly like a lot of Motorhome users you need to change the engine oil ( me, the oil filter as well). But I can't get around my head why some prat designed a cam belt running in oil and costing a small fortune to change.And many failed
Timing chains are only regularly failing on more modern engines where designers have specced chains that are lighter and therefore weaker. Most Older engines with timing chains rattled for years before eventually failing.So have timing chains , cambelts .it's also recommended if you stopping using a vehicle regularly like a lot of Motorhome users you need to change the engine oil ( me, the oil filter as well). But I can't get around my head why some prat designed a cam belt running in oil and costing a small fortune to change.
Agree the 2.1 merc is very good and quite economical at about 28/ 29 on out 5500kg unitthat
I have the 3 litre cam chain in the only motorhome I have ever owned. Had it for more than 10 years and 45000 miles.3.0 litre is a cam chain up to 180 bhp a peach of an engine
2.8 litre is cam belt but older bullet proof engine
2.3 litre cam belt is fiats standard engine
2.2 litre is a ford puma cam chain
engine
These are all sevel van engines so I wouldn’t get a comfortmatic gearbox after reading the woes on here the manual gearbox is fine!
We are talking old engines here pre adblue etc!
New ones I know nothing about.
I have a 2013 lhd Citroen jumper (relay) with the 2.2 litre ford puma no problems with it and 86000 miles![]()
No worry just get changed at 5 years, same as tyres!I have the 3 litre cam chain in the only motorhome I have ever owned. Had it for more than 10 years and 45000 miles.
It's excellent IMHO. Especially not having to worry about cam belt changes. However, performance is also very good![]()
A lot of them are as they've strangled the life out of them in order to be immission compliant.
I agree with you for the most part but you do need to consider the pulling power when looking at heavier motorhomes especially as many owners have a distinct aversion to euro toll roads so will spend a lot of time going up & down the gears and you certainly don't want to tow using an engine with only 350Nm of torque or have anything less than around 390Nm on a moho weighing over 4000kg.
I don't want to gloat but apart from agreeing with you 100% about how good the 3.0l cam chain engine is and how later emissions regulations have been not so great for modern engines..The 3.0 Iveco derived engine, is, in my opinion, the best engine ever to grace a Motorhome. Mainly because it has a cam chain and so additional reliability over engines from the same period which had belts (although if well maintained, belted engines can be just as good, just not as powerful).
I was talking to an old, now retired, diesel mechanic just last week on this (albeit Diesel engines in general, not just Motorhome related). Older N/A diesels used to go on for years and years (old tractors etc), due to their simplicity, you could throw them in a river, then drag them out and start them (within reason). Unfortunately emissions regulations and restrictions placed on manufacturers meant that they had to introduce EGR's, DPF's, Ad-Blu and a huge array of sensors and ECU control - Which as he said would be like cutting your food intake in half, with the other half now being made up of eating your own poop.