Cheshirecat57
Free Member
FlapjackIt wasn't me that restarted this discussion involving me personally, please refer to #66 by The general , if I am quoted I reserve the right to reply
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FlapjackIt wasn't me that restarted this discussion involving me personally, please refer to #66 by The general , if I am quoted I reserve the right to reply
why is it that dyslexic people always manage to spell dyslexic correctly ..... ??
So long as it keeps you happy ... some people are easily pleased!
Oh I did, it just gets a bit boring reading the 'same thing' all the time ... I've got a new one for you to 'investigate' ... what came first, the chicken or the egg? (That should keep you busy for a while!).
North East Englandshire or Scotland......BIG differenceHi all thinking about 1 or 2 overnights on the east coast somewhere next week for wife's birthday. Thinking we might not be welcome anywhere too so really not sure. Haven't got a clue where to stay or even if anywhere available to pitch and plug in overnight. Anyone any ideas? 1 night wild if nothing else available. We have 2 dogs to walk too and like a nice beach near ish. ??? Have mixed feelings about doing it and the reaction we might get ?
Nah, tea arrived and it was MUCH more interesting!Ho ho ho ......run out of logical arguments and resorting to attempts at p***s taking.....very poor
I suspect you to be correct. However, unless someone points out theLaw is law.
Doesn't always make sense.
Isn't morals
Isn't logical
people will always look for loopholes (one look at tax law is proof of this). The more loopholes that are found the greater the complexity of the law.
in law there is a preset of obeying the ethos of that law.
If we do not obey the ethos the law will become more stringent and prescriptive.
many of the rules imposed on the back of this virus have not matched common sense and have often conflicted with practices required from guidance.
just because you can doesn't mean you should. Nonsense is not a defence.
True. The travel rules are a joke, lack continuity, logic and reason.
Also true is the need to obey them at the moment. In another week or two the gravitational pull of people realising the ludicrousness will cause them to ease but if too many break them to early the result will be tighter controls. Let's lull the authorities into a false security.
law and sense do not always go hand in hand.
The difference is that a long distance truck driver is delivering food for the nation (for example) a MoHo owner is not playing by the current rules and will attract a fine and be sent home.I wonder what all the long distance truck drivers are doing now, they will certainly be parking up somewhere!
I personally see nothing wrong with parking up somewhere and not coming into contact with anyone, after all is that not what wildcampers aim for.
The difference is that a long distance truck driver is delivering food for the nation (for example) a MoHo owner is not playing by the current rules and will attract a fine and be sent home.
I suspect you to be correct. However, unless someone points out theStupidityillogicality of (any) current diktat. Those who`s bright idea it was, will assume they are more astute than their actual intelligence level would indicate?. As we are aware, much of this alleged temporary control legislation is formulated bynumptiesBureaucrats, and passed to Ministers to inform the proletariat. There is nothing a Bureaucrat likes more than to believe He/She/It, is in control of any given situation. Which IMV is often why the country lurches from one extreme (of stupidity) to the other.
It has been my long held belief that "Yes Minister" was far less comedic, and more than accurate in its underlying description of the machinations of Whitehall, and our Local Authorities.
Coronavirus: Will I be able to go on holiday?
You are free to drive any distance to other destinations in England, like parks and beaches, but are not supposed to stay overnight somewhere you do not normally live. This includes any second property you may own.
That is the BBC‘s version of what was said not exactly what Boris Johnson said when asked about holiday homes.'not supposed to'
I'm a new member and find that people like to bully others online if they have a different view, and this forum is showing the same social tendencies. It's abhorrent and you should desist. Those of us who are older than the NHS followed our parents in fighting for freedom of expression and tolerating different views and activities. Those self righteous posters need to consider how governments control populations, perhaps reading Joe Goebbles for an insight into propaganda.Newish member ... only second post.... new to motor homing....
"Wow"................... gives them a nice impression on how this club works...
Newish member ... only second post.... new to motor homing....
"Wow"................... gives them a nice impression on how this club works...
Long distance lorry drivers are at work and are therefore totally legal to park up. I live fairly near the coast and i can assure you the locals will not be happy about anybody parking up in a MoHo. You can thank also the MoHo's that park up for days in a lay by with lovely views, and drive off leaving rubbish and worse.I wonder what all the long distance truck drivers are doing now, they will certainly be parking up somewhere!
I personally see nothing wrong with parking up somewhere and not coming into contact with anyone, after all is that not what wildcampers aim for.
Not quite sure what you are trying to say here. From the sound of it, it seems you think we should ignore the majority advice given on this forum, and at the same time ignore government advice, and basically do your own thing.I'm a new member and find that people like to bully others online if they have a different view, and this forum is showing the same social tendencies. It's abhorrent and you should desist. Those of us who are older than the NHS followed our parents in fighting for freedom of expression and tolerating different views and activities. Those self righteous posters need to consider how governments control populations, perhaps reading Joe Goebbles for an insight into propaganda.
Oh I did, it just gets a bit boring reading the 'same thing' all the time ... I've got a new one for you to 'investigate' ... what came first, the chicken or the egg? (That should keep you busy for a while!).
quis custodiet ipsos custodies. Who will watch the watchers?.
Oh I did, it just gets a bit boring reading the 'same thing' all the time ... I've got a new one for you to 'investigate' ... what came first, the chicken or the egg? (That should keep you busy for a while!).
The egg as the fowl that laid it wasn't quite a hen / chicken but a proto-chicken.
The Press.
The egg as the fowl that laid it wasn't quite a hen / chicken but a proto-chicken.
The Press.
Both right but....Hi Minxy Girl , nothing to do with this thread however had to answer this question as to which came first the Chicken or the egg:
the Egg had to come first as chickens (in common with all birds) evolved from dinosaurs each of which are born as eggs (stay with me here) therefore at some point in time the thing that hatched changed from being a recognisable dinosaur to being a recognisable chicken therefore in theory (with a bit of artistic licence and ignoring all the evolution between dinosaur and chicken) a dinosaur laid an egg and the first chicken hatched out of it even ignoring the bit between the bottom line is the first ever recognisable chicken hatched from an egg laid by an animal that wasnt a recognisable chicken hence the egg came first.
Both wrong....
Who said anything about the egg being a chicken egg?
The question was, what came first the chicken or the egg?
You both took the assumption the question related to a chicken egg ????
Can you tell I’m bored....
I did amend my post, when I realised what I’d done......Very true XxAnthxX however the answer would still be the egg even if you are simply considering both Egg and chicken as an entity (or concept come to that).
I take your boredom and double it!
You win I’m out.......??????yes XxAnthxX but Surely if you were to amend your post you would have arrived at pots, spot or tops or more importantly stop which is what the chicken did after it came out of the egg (yet again proving the Egg came first).
I take your raise of 10 boredoms and am now all in (and bear in mind I have just finished counting my garden seeds ready for planting and have calculated I have sufficient seeds to plant at the rate of 5 seeds per square inch)!!